Dr.Ram Gopal Yadav v. State Of Chhattisgarh And ORS.

yn i301 OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR (c G) iN THE HON BLE HIGH COURT N (S) No 2% 0 (6 12013 WRIT PETmO

IN THE MATTER OF ARTICLE 226 OF

.

THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA ;

'

AND

IN THE MATTER OF CHHATTISGARH

SHASKIYA SEVAK (ADHIVARSHIKI:

AYU) ADHINIYAM 1967 ;

AND

IN THE MATTER OF QHHATTISGARH

NON GOVERNMENT COLLEGES AND INaTITUTIONS IN HIGHER EDUCATION (ESTABLISHMENT AND REGULATION) ACT AND BETWEEN :

'

Dr. Ram Gopal Yadav, son of late Shri Leela PETITIONER Ram Yadav, aged about 61 years, posted as AssustantLIbrarian P Vipra College Bilaspur Post Bllaspur Thana Tarbahar Dlstrlct Bllaspur Chhattlsgarh

VERSUS

:

ggywh~;n.~..., 1.

State of Chhattisgarh, thrbugh it's '

Secretary, Department of Higher Education, Mantralaya, Naya Raipur, Thana Mandir Hasod, Post Office L .

Mantralaya, District Raipur, Chhattisgarh ;WNg,h,, :

2.

Commissioner, Department of Higher Education, Government Science guw,'

College Campus, Raipur, District Raipur, Chhattisgarh 3.

University Grants Commission through Its Secretary Bahadur Shah Zafar Marg, New Delhl 110002 4.

ID.

P Vipra College.

through its Pnncrpal Bilaspur Post Bilaspur Thana ~ Tarbahar District Brlaspur Chhattlsgarh ..

-aM.

ATnIrito gas, Advoc/ate/ M"

UN?

HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR DIVISION BENCH CORAM: HON'BLE SHRI NAVIN SINHA, ACTING CHIEF JUSTICE & HON'BLE SHRI MANINDRA MOHAN SHRIVASTAVA, J.

Writ Petition (S) No.

PETITIONER :

Dr. Ram Gopal Yadav.

VERSUS

RESPONDENTS :

State of Chhattisgarh & Others.

'I WRIT PETITION UNDER ARTICLE 226 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA _ > Appearance:

Shri Amrito Das, Advocate for the Petitioner.

Shri GaryMukhopadhyay, Deputy GovernmentAdvocate for the State.

'

gh Rajput, Advocate for the Respondent .....

Mm O R D E W "Vii .....

(05m of January, 201§ ......

Per Navin Sinha, 1.

We have heard Petitioner and the Respondents.

2.

The issue involveIE application relates to enhancement of'

age for superann years for the post of Assistant Librarian.

ma?! 6121a 3..

Learned Counsel for the parties are agreed that the writ application may be disposed in similar terms as Writ Petition (S) No. 6318 of 2014. 4.

The writ application stands disposed in the aforesaid terms. Sd/'

i Manindra Mohan Shrivastava \/ SdlActing Chief Justice Judge Amit