Sanat Kumar Shukla v. State Bank Of India And ORS.

NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH, BILASPUR Writ Petition (C) No.

of 201 Sanat Kumar Shukla, S/o. Shri Bala Ram Shukla, aged about 45 years, Occupation Govt. Servant, R/o. E/406, H.T.P.S. Korba, West Colony, Korba P.S. Darri, Tahsil and District Korba (C.G.) ---- Petitioner

Versus

1. State Bank of India, Main Branch Korba, Through: It's Branch Manager, Korba, District Korba (C.G.)

2. Satya Construction, "Sagar Deep Enclave" Near Uslapur, Railway Crossing Mungeli Road, Ameri, Bilaspur, District Bilaspur (C.G.)

3. Additional Tahsildar, Sakri, Sub-Tahsil Sakri, District Bilaspur (C.G.) ---- Respondents For Petitioner :

Mr. Bharat Rajput, Advocate.

For Respondent No.1:

Mr.Abhishek Sinha, Advoate.

For State : Mr. R.N. Pusty, Govt. Advocate.

Hon'ble Shri Justice Sanjay K. Agrawal Order On Board 02/0 1 /201 (1) Learned counsel appearing for respondent No.1/ Bank would submit that the petitioner has deposited the amount in dispute and settlement has been entered into between the petitioner and respondent No.1/Bank, as such, the petition has become infructuous. (2) In view of above, the writ petition is dismissed as having become infructuous.

Sd/- (Sanjay K. Agrawal) Judge