Smt. Bharti Dewangan v. State Of Chhattisgarh

-1NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH, BILASPUR WPS No. 4510 of 2016

1. Smt. Bharti Dewangan W/o Chandrabhan Dewangan, Aged About 43 Years R/o Village Motipur, P O Ramatola P S Dongargarh, District Rajnandgaon (Chhattisgarh)

2. Purushottam Kumar Chandrawanshi, S/o Late Lakhan Lal, Aged About 39 Years R/o Village Motipur, P O Ramatola P S Dongargarh, District Rajnandgaon (Chhattisgarh)

3. Phoolchand Sahu S/o Shri Kanwal Lal Sahu, Aged About 36 Years R/o Village And Post Ramatola, Tahsil Dongargarh, District Rajnandgaon (Chhattisgarh) ---- Petitioners

Versus

1. State Of Chhattisgarh Through The Secretary, Department Of Panchayat And Rural Development, Mahanadi Bhawan, Mantralaya, Post & P S Mandir Hasaud, Raipur (Chhattisgarh)

2. Rajiv Gandhi Shiksha Mission Through Mission Director, Rajnandgaon (Chhattisgarh)

3. District Education Officer, Rajnandgaon (Chhattisgarh)

4. Chief Executive Officer, Janpad Panchayat, Dongargarh, District Rajnandgaon (Chhattisgarh) ---- Respondents For Petitioners :

Shri Varun Sharma, Advocate For State :

Shri Bhaskar Payashi, Panel Lawyer S.B.:

Hon'ble Shri Justice Manindra Mohan Shrivastava Order On Board 27/09/2016 Heard.

1. Shri Varun Sharma, counsel appearing for the petitioners submit that the issue involved herein has already been considered and decided by the

-2Division Bench of this Court in Chhattisgarh Rajya Panchayat Vaikalpik Shikshak Sangh and Ors. Vs. State of Chhattisgarh and Ors. (WP No.1731 of 2005) and other connected matters decided on 11.8.2010, wherein on the submission of learned Additional Advocate General, the Court disposed off the writ petitions with a direction to take decision as expeditiously as possible. In view of the above observation made by the Division Bench of this Court in Chhattisgarh Rajya Panchayat Vaikalpik Shikshak Sangh (supra), the petition may be disposed off.

2. In view of the above, the writ petition is disposed off in terms of Chhattisgarh Rajya Panchayat Vaikalpik Shikshak Sangh (supra) with a direction that in the event the petitioners submit fresh representation before the competent authority within period of one month from today, the said competent authority, subject to verification of the facts, shall take decision, in accordance with law, on its own merits, as early as possible, preferably within a further period of eight weeks from the date of receipt of representation along with certified copy of this order. No order as to costs. Sd/- (Manindra Mohan Shrivastava) Judge Praveen