High Court Of ChhattisgarhWPS/5473/2017disposed off

Virendra Kumar Sinha v. State Of Chhattisgarh

2017-10-13Hon'Ble Shri Justice Manindra Mohan Shrivastava2 pages

-1NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH, BILASPUR WPS No. 5473 of 2017 Virendra Kumar Sinha S/o Jagannath Pratap Aged About 52 Years R/o Forest Range Office, Durgukondal, Tahsil Durgukondal, District Uttar Bastar Kanker Chhattisgarh.

---- Petitioner

Versus

1. State Of Chhattisgarh Through Secretary, Department Of Forest Department Mahanadi Bhavan Mantralaya, New Raipur District Raipur Chhattisgarh.

2. Conservator Of Forest, Forest Circle Kanker District Uttar Bastar Kanker Chhattisgarh.

3. Divisional Forest Officer, East Bhanupratappur Forest Division, Bhanupratappur, District Uttar Bastar Kanker .

4. Durugsaya Negiya. Forester, Special Duties, Durgukondal Area, East Bhanupratappur, District Uttar Bastar Kanker Chhattisgarh.

5. Shri Shrikant Yadu, Forester, Pari. Shah. Hatkondal, Durgukondal Area, East Bhanupratappur, District Uttar Bastar Kanker Chhattisgarh.

6. Ramgaval Sahu, Pari. Shah. Nagarbeda Amabeda Area, Division East Bhanupratappur, District Uttar Bastar Kanker Chhattisgarh. ---- Respondents For Petitioner :

Shri Parag Kotecha, Advocate For State :

Shri Chandresh Shrivastava, Panel Lawyer S.B. Hon'ble Shri Justice Manindra Mohan Shrivastava Order On Board 13/10/2017 Heard.

1. An occasion arose for the petitioner to challenge posting of respondents No. 4, 5 & 6 by order dated 14.8.2017 of the State Govt. on account of the fact that as per the order issued by the State Govt., the Divisional Forest Officer, East Bhanupratappur, Forest Division, Bhanupratappur, posted the

-2petitioner as Sahayak Parichetra Adhikari, Konde, Parichetra Durgukondal and that is the place where the three private respondents have also been transferred, one on administrative exigency and the other two on their own expenses.

2. Learned counsel for the State would submit that the anomaly which is being pointed out by the petitioner may be brought by way of representation to the notice of the State Govt. and the State Govt. will then pass appropriate corrective/modified orders to ensure that every employee gets posting at a place.

3. In view of the above, I am not inclined to keep the matter pending. The petitioner shall submit a representation along with copy of this order within a period of 2 weeks and the State, in turn, shall pass necessary corrective/modified order in respect of the persons regarding their place of posting. Till appropriate order is passed by the State Govt., the petitioner shall be allowed to continue at the present place of posting.

4. The petition is accordingly finally disposed off. Sd/----/- (Manindra Mohan Shrivastava) Judge Praveen