← Library
High Court Of ChhattisgarhWPS/4359/2016disposed off

Sandeep Kumar Kanvar v. South Eastern Coalfields Limited

2016-09-02Hon'Ble Shri Justice Manindra Mohan Shrivastava2 pages

NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH, BILASPUR WPS No. 4359 of 2016 Sandeep Kumar Kanvar S/o Narendra Singh Kanvar, Aged About 26 Years R/o Village Malgaon, P.S. Dipka, Tahsil Katghora, District Korba, (Chhattisgarh) ---- Petitioner

Versus

1. South Eastern Coalfields Limited Through: Its Chairman And Managing Director, Head Office, Basant Vihar, Seepat Road, Bilaspur, District Bilaspur (Chhattisgarh)

2. Chief General Manager, S. E. C. L., Gevra Project, District Korba, (Chhattisgarh)

3. Senior Manager ( Mining), S E C L, Gevra Project, District Korba, (Chhattisgarh)

4. Sub Divisional Officer, Katghora, District Korba, (Chhattisgarh)

5. Additional Tahsildar, Katghora, District Korba, (Chhattisgarh)

6. Additional Collector, Korba, District Korba, (Chhattisgarh) ---- Respondents Shri Basant Kaiwartya, counsel for the petitioner/s. Shri Dhiraj Wankhede, Govt. Advocate for the State. Shri H.B.Agrawal, senior counsel along with Shri Pankaj Agrawal, counsel for respondents on advance copy.

Hon'ble Shri Justice Manindra Mohan Shrivastava Order On Board 02/09/2016 Heard.

1.

The petitioner is aggrieved by inaction on the part of the respondents in considering petitioner's claim for grant of employment in lieu of acquisition of land. 2.

Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the land belonging to the father of the petitioner was acquired by respondents. According to him, there exists policy dated 25/09/91 which is still in force. There is a provision for grant of employment in lieu of acquisition of land either to the person whose land was acquired or his nominee. Learned counsel submits that he is the son of Narendra Singh Kanvar, whose land has been acquired. Despite specific representations made from time to

time and all verifications completed by revenue authorities and submitted to the respondent authorities of SECL, no decision has been taken nor employment is being provided.

3.

From the pleadings and documents which have been placed on record, it is found that there exists a policy dated 25/09/1991 under which, there is provision for grant of employment to one member of the family of the person whose land has been acquired.

4.

The petitioner is the son of one Narendra Singh Kanvar, whose land is acquired. The petitioner has applied and there are documents to show that various certificates, verifications have already been processed and sent from the office of Sub-divisional Officer Katghora to the General Manager, SECL Dipka way back in the year 2012.

5.

Therefore, the claim of the petitioner does not appear to the frivolous and directions can be issued to respondents No. 1 and 2 to consider the claim and take appropriate decision thereupon as early as possible preferably within a period of four months from the date of receipt of copy of the order. 6.

The petition is finally disposed off.

Sd/- (Manindra Mohan Shrivastava) Judge Deepti