Niranjan Lal Barai v. State Of Chhattisgarh
NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH, BILASPUR WPS No. 3348 of 2015 • Niranjan Lal Barai S/o Late Shri B. L. Barai, Aged About 61 Years Occupation Service ( Assistant Grade-Il) And Posted At The Office Of Block Education Officer, Sitapur, Surguja, R/o In Front Of Gayatri Mandir, Mulajim Para, Sitapur, P. S. Sitapur, Civil And Revenue District Surguja, (Chhattisgarh) ---- Petitioner
Versus
1. State Of Chhattisgarh Through The Secretary, Department Of School Education, Mantralaya, Mahanadi Bhawan, New Raipur, District Raipur, (Chhattisgarh)
2. Commissioner, Surguja Division, Ambikapur, District Surguja, (Chhattisgarh)
3. Collector, Surguja, District Surguja, (Chhattisgarh)
4. District Education Officer, Ambikapur, District Surguja, (Chhattisgarh)
5. Additional Collector, Surguja, District Surguja, (Chhattisgarh)
6. Prasad Ram Paikra, Accountant, Posted At The Office Of Block Education Officer, Mainpart, District Surguja, (Chhattisgarh) ---- Respondents For Petitioner Shri Avinash Singh, Advocate For Respondent/State Shri Dheeraj Wankhede, GA Hon'ble Justice Shri Prashant Kumar Mishra Order On Board By 15/09/2015 1.
In this petition, the petitioner is challenging his transfer from the Office of Block Education Officer, Sitapur to Government Higher Secondary School, Nawanagar, Ambikapur.
2.
In view of the Clause 4 of the State Government's transfer policy dated 1-7-2015 for the year 2015-16, on the request made by learned counsel for the petitioner, the petitioner is permitted to withdraw the writ petition with liberty to pursue the representation. 3.
The authority before whom the representation lies under clause 4 of the transfer policy dated 1-7-2015 shall take the decision in the matter at the earliest, preferably within a period of six weeks from the date of presentation of certified copy of this order. 4.
It is made clear that this Court has not expressed any opinion on the merits of the case and the respondent authorities shall decide the matter, on its own merits, strictly in accordance with law, without treating any observation made in this order, as opinion on the merits of the case.
Sd/- JUDGE PRASHANT KUMAR MISHRA Nirala