Ajay Kumar Harijan v. State Of Chhattisgarh
NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH, BILASPUR M.Cr.C. No. 3379 of 2018
1. Ajay Kumar Harijan S/o Laxman, aged about 19 years, R/o Vill Majhgavan, P.S. Kadipar, District Sultanpur (U.P.)
2. Vakil Vind S/o Hariram, aged about 28 years, r/o Village Jatouli, Vankegaon, P.S. Kadipur, District Sultanpur (U.P.) ----Applicants
Versus
The State of Chhattisgarh, through Police Station Nagarnar, Jagdalpur, District Bastar, C.G.
---- Non-applicant For Applicants :
Mr. Vikas Shrivastava , Advocate.
For Respondent/State :
Mr. Avinash Singh, Panel Lawyer.
Hon'ble Shri Justice Sanjay K. Agrawal Order On Board 25/06/18 1.
This is the first bail application filed under Section 439 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 for grant of regular bail to the applicants who have been arrested in connection with Crime No. 51/17, registered at Police Station Nagarnaar, Bastar (C.G.) for the offence punishable under Section 20-B of the NDPS Act.
2.
Case of the prosecution, in brief, is that, about 40 kgs of Cannabis (ganja) was seized by the police from the possession of the present applicants.
3.
Learned counsel for the applicants submit that the applicants have been falsely implicated in the crime in question. He further submits that the applicants are in custody since 03.04.2017 and charge-sheet has been filed
and the statements of the witnesses are being examined and the trial is likely to take some time for its final disposal, therefore they may be released on bail.
4.
On the other hand, learned counsel for the State opposes the bail application.
5.
I have heard learned counsel appearing for the parties and perused the case diary.
6.
After hearing learned counsel for the parties and in view of the fact that about 40 kgs of Cannabis (ganja) was found in possession of the present applicants, I do not consider it fit case for grant of bail. 7.
Accordingly, bail application filed under Section 439 of the Cr.P.C. is rejected.
Certified copy as per rules.
SD/- (Sanjay K. Agrawal) Judge Priyanka