High Court Of ChhattisgarhWPC/1675/2015disposed off

Aishwarya Sinha v. State Of Chhattisgarh

2015-09-16Hon'Ble The Chief Justice,Hon'Ble Shri Justice P. Sam Koshy2 pages

NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH, BILASPUR Writ Petition (C) No. 1675 of 2015 Aishwarya Sinha D/o Late Shri M. S. Sinha, Aged About 20 Years R/o Vijay Niwas, Beside Cooperative Bank, Devi Ganj Road, Ambikapur, District Surguja, (Chhattisgarh) ---- Petitioner

Versus

1. State Of Chhattisgarh Through The Secretary, Department Of Health & Family Welfare, D. K. S Bhawan, Mantralaya, Raipur, (Chhattisgarh)

2. Director, Medical Education Directorate, Government Of Chhattisgarh, New Mantralaya, Raipur, (Chhattisgarh)

3. Sneha Verma C/o Director, Medical Education, Directorate, Government Of Chhattisgarh, New Mantralaya, Raipur, (Chhattisgarh)

4. Ayush Awasthi C/o Director, Medical Education Directorate, Government Of Chhattisgarh, New Mantralaya, Raipur, (Chhattisgarh)

5. Neha Sahu C/o Director, Medical Education, Driectorate, Government Of Chhattisgarh, New Mantralaya, Raipur, (Chhattisgarh)

6. Chandulal Chandrakar Memorial Medical College, Through The Dean, Village Kachandur, P. S. Kachandur, Tehsil And District Durg, (Chhattisgarh) ---- Respondents Petitioner:

Shri Jitendra Pali, Advocate.

Respondents/State:

Shri UNS. Deo, Government Advocate.

Hon'ble The Chief Justice Hon'ble Shri Justice P. Sam Koshy Order On Board Per Navin Sinha, Chief Justice 16/09/2015 1.

After some arguments, in view of the Petitioner having clicked the second option that she was satisfied with the allotted institute and course and that she desired to take admission in the allotted institute, Learned Counsel for the Petitioner submits that on account of certain changed circumstances, the Petitioner proposes to represent before the authorities under Rule-12 of the Chhattisgarh Medical and Dental Medicine Graduate Admission Rules,

2015 to pursue the representation filed before the Director, Medical Education and/or file a fresh representation before the State Government. 2.

We make no observation with regard to the same. Nothing precludes the Respondents from considering the representation expeditiously in their wisdom despite our reluctance to entertain the Writ Petition. 3.

The Writ Petition is disposed.

Sd/- Sd/- (Navin Shiha) (P. Sam Koshy) CHIEF JUSTICE JUDGE Priya