Sukhwant Singh v. Chairman/ Managing Director

-1NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR WPS No. 3268 of 2019 Sukhwant Singh S/o. Late Kartar Singh, Aged About 61 Years Occupation Retired Deputy Manager, Resident Of 28/7, Nehru Nagar, East Bhilai, District Durg, Chhattisgarh.

---- Petitioner

Versus

1. Chairman/ Managing Director United Indian Insurance Co. Ltd. 24, Whites Road, Chennai, 600014

2. General Manager (Personnel), United India Insurance Co. Ltd. 24, Whites Road, Chennai, 600014.

3. Deputy Regional Manager, United India Insurance Co. Ltd. Regional Office, Raipur, Chhattisgarh. 647-A, 648 And 649, 6th Floor, Magneto Offizo, Magneto, The Mall, Labhandi, Raipur, 492010

4. Chief Regional Manager, United India Insurance Co. Ltd. Regional Office, Raipur, Chhattisgarh. 647-A, 648 And 649, 6th Floor, Magneto Offizo, Magneto, The Mall, Labhandi, Raipur 492010 ---Respondent For Petitioner :

Mr. Ajay Shrivastava, Advocate Hon'ble Shri Justice P. Sam Koshy Order on Board 02/05/2019 1.

The limited relief that the petitioner has sought through the present writ petition is for an appropriate direction to the respondent No.2 for deciding the representation that the petitioner has made so far as releasing of his retiral dues are concerned.

2.

According to the petitioner, his services have been terminated by the respondents vide order dated 05.07.2017, but thereafter no terminal benefits have been given to the petitioner; like leave encashment, gratuity, medical reimbursement and amount under the welfare fund, etc. 3.

Given the limited prayer that the petitioner has made, this Court is of the opinion that ends of justice would meet if the respondent No.2 decides the

-2claim of the petitioner in accordance with the service regulations governing the employees/officers of the respondents/Insurance Company. 4.

It is made clear that this Court has not expressed any opinion on the merits of the entitlement of the petitioner. The respondent No.2 is expected of taking a decision purely in accordance with the merit keeping in view the service regulations governing the field.

5.

It is expected that the respondent No.2 shall take a decision at the earliest preferably within a period of 4 months from the date of receipt of the copy of this order 6.

With the aforesaid observations, the present writ petition stands disposed off.

Sd/- (P. Sam Koshy) Judge Ved