← Library
High Court Of ChhattisgarhWP/3372/2005dismissed

B.S.N. Naidu v. State Of Mp

2017-11-22Hon'Ble Shri Justice Sanjay K. Agrawal2 pages

NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH, BILASPUR W.P.

No.

of 20 0 5 B.S.N. Naidu, S/o Late B.K. Naidu, aged about 47 yers, L.D.C., Rashtriya Rajmarg Up-Sambhag, Lok Nirman Vibhag, Geedam, District Bastar (M.P.) (Now CG) ---- Petitioner

Versus

1. State of Madhya Pradesh, through the Secretary, Lok Nirman Vibhag, M.P., Vallabh Bhawan, Bhopal (M.P.)

2. The Pramukh Abhiyanta, Lok Nirman Vibhag, Satpuda Bhawan, Bhopal (M.P.)

3. The Mukhya Abhiyanta, Rashtriya Rajmarg Parikshetra, Lok Nirman Vibhag , Satpuda Bhawan, Bhopal (M.P.)

4. The Adhikshan Yantri, Rashtriya Rajmarg Mandal, Lok Nirman Vibhag, Byron Bazar, Raipur (M.P.)

5. The Karya Palan Yantri, Rashtriya Rajmarg Sambhag, Lok Nirman Vighag, Jagdalpur, M.P. - 494001

6. Shri R.S. Negi, Asstt. Grade II, C/o S.D.O., N.H. Sub Division, Geedam, Tahsil Dantewada, Distt. Bastar (M.P.)

7. Shri R.S. Nag, Asstt. Grade II, C/o S.D.O., N.H. Sub Division, Jagdalpur, Distt. Bastar (M.P.)

8. Smt. Shakuntala Thakur, Asstt. Grade II, C/o S.E.N.H., Circle Lok Nirman Vibhag, Byron Bazar, Raipur (M.P.) ---- Respondents For Petitioner:

None For Respondent/State:

Mr. Aditya Sharma, Panel Lawyer Hon'ble Shri Justice Sanjay K. Agrawal Order On Board 2 2/ /201 (1) Even after the matter was called in the second round, none appeared for the petitioner, therefore, in these circumstances, this Court has no other option but to dismiss the writ petition for want of prosecution. (2) Accordingly, the writ petition is dismissed for want of prosecution. Sd/- (Sanjay K. Agrawal) Judge