← Library
High Court Of ChhattisgarhWPS/3244/2021disposed off

Dr. Vijay Kumar Kaushal v. State Of Chhattisgarh

2021-07-05Hon'Ble Shri Justice P. Sam Koshy2 pages

NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR WPS No. 3244 of 2021 Dr. Vijay Kumar Kaushal Son Of Shri Mahajan Kaushal Aged About 34 Years Lecturer (Lb), Posted At Govt, Boys Higher Secondary School Simga, District Baloda Bazar - Bhatapara (Chhattisgarh), At Present R/o. Kaushal Palace, House No. 2931, Street No. 3, Sainath Colony, Pota Raipur, District Raipur (Chhattisgarh) ---- Petitioner

Versus

1.

State Of Chhattisgarh Through The Secretary, School Education Department, Mantralaya, Nava Raipur, Atal Nagar, Raipur, District Raipur (Chhattisgarh) 2.

Director Public Education, Directorate, State Of Chhattisgarh, Indiravati Bhawan, Block 3rd, 1st Floor, Atal Nagar, Nava Raipur, District Raipur (Chhattisgarh) 3.

Director Urban Administration Department And Development Department, Indiravati Bhawan, Nava Raipur, Atal Nagar, Raipur, District Raipur (Chhattisgarh) 4.

District Education Officer Baloda Bazar-Bhatapara, District Balodabazar- Bhatapara (Chhattisgarh) 5.

Principal Govt. Boys Higher Secondary School Simga, District Baloda Bazar-Bhatapara (Chhattisgarh) ----Respondents For Petitioner :

Mr. Pushpendra Kumar Patel, Advocate For State :

Mr. Ishan Verma, Panel Lawyer Hon'ble Shri Justice P. Sam Koshy Order on Board 05/07/2021 1.

The limited grievance that the petitioner has in the present writ petition is the inaction on the part of the respondents in not granting the benefit of two advance increments on account of the petitioner obtaining Ph.D.

2.

The counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner had got Ph.D. in the year 2019 and since then he has applied for grant of two advance increments in terms of the circular applicable in the

State of Chhattisgarh however the respondents have neither granted the benefit nor decided his claim.

3.

Given the limited grievance that the petitioner has, the writ petition at this juncture stands disposed of directing the respondents No. 2 to 4 to redress the grievance of the petitioner, who shall duly scrutinize the claim of the petitioner and consider the circulars governing the field and take an appropriate decision at the earliest within a period of 4 months from the date of receipt of the copy of this order 4.

With the aforesaid observations, the present writ petition stands disposed of.

Sd/- (P. Sam Koshy) Judge Ved