High Court Of ChhattisgarhWPS/5252/2016disposed off

Ramswarup Markam v. State Of Chhattisgarh

2016-09-28Hon'Ble Shri Justice Manindra Mohan Shrivastava2 pages

NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH, BILASPUR Writ Petition (S) No.5252 of 2016 Ramswarup Markam S/o Ful Singh Markam, Aged About 48 Years Posted As Jal Wahak, Scheduled Caste Pre Metric Boys Hostel Jarhagaon, Block Takhatpur, District Mungeli Chhattisgarh ---- Petitioner

Versus

1. State Of Chhattisgarh Through The Secretary, Department Of Tribal Welfare, Mantralaya, Mahanadi Bhawan, New Raipur, District Raipur Chhattisgarh

2. Commissioner, Tribal Welfare And Development, Department, Raipur Chhattisgarh

3. Assistant Commissioner, Tribal Welfare And Development, Mungeli, District Mungeli Chhattisgarh

4. Collector, (Tribal Welfare And Development) Mungeli, Distirct Mungeli Chhattisgarh

5. Distirct Coordinator, Tribal Welfare Department, Mungeli, Distirct Mungeli, Chhattisgarh ---- Respondents For Petitioner :

Mr. B.P. Banjare, Advocate For Respondent-State :

Mr. Dheeraj Wankhede, Govt. Advocate Hon'ble Shri Manindra Mohan Shrivastava, J.

Order on Board 28/09/2016 Heard.

1. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that case of the petitioner is similar to Smt. Vipti Bai and others v. State of Chhattisgarh and others, who filed petition being Writ Petition (S) No.1138/2016 before this Court, in which, the

order was passed on 18.4.2016 with a direction to consider their grievance by making detailed representation.

2. A perusal of the order dated 18.4.2016 shows that the Court recorded that petitioners may approach the respondents raising claim for equal pay for equal work and in view of the statement made by State counsel, petition was disposed off with a direction to consider the representations of the petitioners without expressing any opinion on the merits of the case.

3. In the present case, the petitioner has approached this Court directly and has not made any representation. Therefore in these circumstances, all that can be done is to direct that if the petitioner makes representation to the authorities claiming parity with those petitioners in whose favor order has been passed in WPS No.1138/2016 (Smt. Vipti Bai and others v. State of Chhattisgarh and others), claim of the petitioner shall also be examined in accordance with law and in light of decision rendered in Smt. Vipti Bai (supra).

4. With the aforesaid observation, the petition stands disposed off. Sd/- (Manindra Mohan Shrivastava) Judge Tiwari