Smt. Mandavi Singh v. State Of Chhattisgarh
NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH, BILASPUR WPS No. 2867 of 2020 • Smt. Mandavi Singh W/o Late Shri Satyavrat Singh Aged About 64 Years R/o Aashadham Marg, Bahtarai Road, Sarkanda, Bilaspur, Police StationSarkanda, District- Bilaspur, (C.G.). ---- Petitioner
Versus
1. State Of Chhattisgarh Through The Secretary, Forest Department, Mahanadi Bhawan, Mantralaya, Atal Nagar, New Raipur, (C.G.)
2. The Chief Conservator Of Forest, Aranya Bhawan, Raipur, (C.G.).
3. The Divisional Forest Officer Bilaspur Forest Division, District- Bilaspur
4. The Joint Director, Treasury, Accounts And Pension, Bilaspur, Division, Bilaspur, (C.G.).
---- Respondents For Petitioner :
Shri Rahul Mishra, Advocate For Respondents/ State :
Shri Vikram Sharma, Dy. G.A.
Hon'ble Shri Justice Goutam Bhaduri Order 21/07/2020 Heard.
1. The nature of reliefs claimed needs to be adjudicated after evidence is adduced as inter succession rival claim has been made by the petitioner on the basis of the right conferred by the Succession Court. Therefore, this Court under Article 226 cannot record the evidence of the parties to decide the right of the petitioner namely Smt. Mandavi Singh, further the entitlement and apportionment of claim needs to be proved before the competent court
having the jurisdiction. This Court can not act as a Court of Succession and interpret the earlier order passed by the Court below.
2. In view of this, the petition is devoid of all merits and accordingly stands dismissed, however, the petitioner shall have the liberty to approach the competent Court if so advised.
Sd/- Goutam Bhaduri Judge Jyoti