← Library
High Court Of ChhattisgarhWPS/4413/2013disposed off

Shiv Kumar Kaushik v. State Of Chhattisgarh And ORS.

2021-09-28Hon'Ble Shri Justice Sanjay K. Agrawal3 pages

NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH, BILASPUR WPS No.4413 of 2013 • Shiv Kumar Kaushik, S/o G. R. Kaushik, Aged About 49 Years, R/o Gaya Vihar, Sarkanda, PS and Tahsil, Distt Bilaspur, Chhattisgarh ---- Petitioner

Versus

1. State Of Chhattisgarh Through The Secretary, Women and Child Welfare Department, Mahanadi Bhawan, Mantralaya, Naya Raipur, Tahsil and Distt Raipur, Chhattisgarh

2. Director, Women and Child Welfare Department, Tahsil and Distt Raipur, Chhattisgarh

3. District Women and Child Welfare Officer, Bilaspur, Tahsil & District Bilaspur, Chhattisgarh

4. Collector, Bilaspur, Distt Bilaspur, Chhattisgarh ---- Respondents For Petitioner Mr. Anup Majumdar, Advocate For Respondent-State Mr. Shakti Singh, PL Hon'ble Justice Shri Sanjay K. Agrawal Order On Board 28/09/2021 1.

Mr. Anup Majumdar, learned counsel for the petitioner, would submit that the petitioner was initially appointed on the post of Lower

Division Clerk on adhoc basis and thereafter in the year 1986 he was regularized on the said post. He would further submit that vide gradation list (Annexure-P/7), the seniority of the petitioner has been shown w.e.f. 12.03.1990 instead of 25.03.1985. The petitioner is also entitled for promotion on the next higher post. The petitioner has also made representation to the respondent authorities in this regard, but the same has not been considered and decided till date.

2.

Mr. Shakti Singh, learned State counsel, would submit that the petitioner's representation shall be considered and decided within reasonable time.

3.

Be that as it may, the respondent authorities are directed to consider and decide the petitioner's representation in accordance with law by a reasoned and speaking order within a period of 6 weeks from the date of receipt of copy of this order. The petitioner is at liberty to make fresh representation and file documents in support of his claim within a period of 2 weeks from today.

4.

With the aforesaid observation and direction, the writ petition stands disposed of. No order as to cost (s).

Sd/- Sanjay K. Agrawal Judge Nirala