Kailash Chandra v. State Of Chhattisgarh

NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH, BILASPUR WPS No. 3586 of 2015 • Ku. Ranu Chandra D/o Shri Jeetmani Chandra, Aged About 26 Years R/o Village Thuthi, Post OfÏce Thathari, Police Station & Tahsil Jaijaipur, District Janjgir Champa, (Chhattisgarh) ---- Petitioner

Versus

1. State Of Chhattisgarh Acting Through The Secretary, Higher Education Department, Government Of Chhattisgarh, Naya Raipur, District Raipur, (Chhattisgarh)

2. Principal, Government Bilasa Girls, P.G. College Bilaspur, District Bilaspur, (Chhattisgarh) ---- Respondent WPS No. 3587 Of 2015 Kailash Chandra S/o Shri Buddheshwar Singh Chandra, Aged About 31 Years R/o Village & Post Odekera, Police Station & Tahsil Jaijaipur, District Janjgir Champa, (Chhattisgarh) ---- Petitioner Vs

1. State Of Chhattisgarh Acting Through The Secretary, Higher Education DeparJtment, Government Of Chhattisgarh, Naya Raipur, District Raipur, (Chhattisgarh)

2. Principal, Government Navin College, Jaijaipur, District Janjgir Champa, (Chhattisgarh) ---- Respondent WPS No. 3588 Of 2015 • Kailash Chandra S/o Shri Buddheshwar Singh Chandra, Aged About 31 Years R/o Village & Post Odekera, Police Station & Tahsil Jaijaipur, District Janjgir Champa, (Chhattisgarh) ---- Petitioner Vs

1. State Of Chhattisgarh Acting Through The Secretary, Higher

Education Department, Government Of Chhattisgarh, Naya Raipur, District Raipur, (Chhattisgarh)

2. Principal, Government College Pandatarai, District Kabirdham, (Kawardha) (Chhattisgarh) ---- Respondent And WPS No. 3590 Of 2015 • Kailash Chandra S/o Shri Buddheshwar Singh Chandra, Aged About 31 Years R/o Village & Post Odekera, Police Station & Tahsil Jaijaipur, District Janjgir Champa Chhattisgarh ---- Petitioner Vs

1. State Of Chhattisgarh Acting Through The Secretary, Higher Education Department, Government Of Chhattisgarh, Naya Raipur, District Raipur Chhattisgarh

2. Principal, Government Navin College Pali, District Korba Chhattisgarh ---- Respondent For Petitioners Mr. Ramesh Nayak, Advocate For Respondent/State Mr. P.K. Bhaduri, Govenrment Advocate Hon'ble Shri Justice Prashant Kumar Mishra Order On Board 6/10/2015 Heard.

(2) Learned counsel for the State, on instructions, would submit that since a consolidated recruitment process was initiated for recruitment of Laboratoy Technician in different colleges, although separate advertisements were issued college wise, the authorities are taking

sometime to declare the result. As per the instructions, he would submit that depending upon the report of analysis of entire recruitment process, a decision would be taken within reasonable time. (3) In view of the above, nothing survives in these petitions for consideration. The writ petitions are accordingly disposed of. (4) However, depending upon the decision taken by the State Government, the petitioners would be at liberty to move afresh before this Court.

Sd/- Judge (Prashant Kumar Mishra) Shyna