Panchu Ram Nishad v. State Of Chhattisgarh And ORS.

NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH, BILASPUR WPC No. 754 of 2013

1. Panchu Ram Nishad S/o Kokadi Aged About 50 Years R/o Vill Agarikala, Gram Panchayat Dudhiya, PS & Tah. Kawardha, Dist Kabirdham, Chhattisgarh ---- Petitioner

Versus

1. State Of Chhattisgarh Through Secretary, Panchayat And Village Development Deptt, Mantralaya, Naya Raipur, Dist Raipur, Chhattisgarh

2. Director Fisheries Deptt, Telibandha, Raipur, Chhattisgarh

3. Asstt Director Fisheries Deptt, Kabirdham, Dist Kabirdham, Chhattisgarh

4. Collector Kabirdham, Dist Kabirdham, Chhattisgarh

5. Sub Divisional Officer Revenue Kawardha, Dist Kabirdham, Chhattisgarh

6. Sarpanch/ Secretary Gram Panchayat Dudhiya, Tah. & Ps Kawardha, Dist Kabirdham, Chhattisgarh

7. Madhu Bai, Panch, R/o Gram Panchayat Dudhiya, Tah. & PS Kawardha, Dist Kabirdham, Chhattisgarh ---- Respondent For Petitioner None For Respondent/State Shri Avinash Singh, Panel Lawyer For Intervener Ms Anubhuti Marhas, Advocate Order On Board By Prashant Kumar Mishra, J.

25/03/2019

1. At the very outset, learned counsel appearing for the intervener would submit that the writ petition has been rendered infructuous by efflux of time.

2. No representation is made on behalf of the petitioner in both the rounds.

3. In view of the above, the writ petition is dismissed as having become infructuous.

Sd/- Judge Prashant Kumar Mishra Gowri