← Library
High Court Of ChhattisgarhWPS/3705/2015dismissed

Sammelal Sahu v. State Of Chhattisgarh

2015-10-13Hon'Ble Shri Justice Prashant Kumar Mishra2 pages

NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH, BILASPUR W.P.(S) No.3705 of 2015 • Sammelal Sahu, son of Ram Prasad Sahu, aged about 44 years, working as Assistant Teacher, Panchayat, Govt. Primary School, Malidih, Block Kasdole, District Baloda Bazar-Bhatapara, Chhattisgarh ---- Petitioner

Versus

1. State of Chhattisgarh, through Secretary, Panchayat Welfare Department, Mahanadi Bhawan, Mantralaya, Naya Raipur, District Raipur, Chhattisgarh

2. Chief Executive OfÏcer, Zila Panchayat, Baloda Bazar, Bhatapara, Chhattisgarh

3. Block Education OfÏcer, Kasdole, District Baloda Bazar, Bhatapara, Chhattisgarh ---- Respondent For Petitioner Mr. CJK Rao, Advocate For Respondent/State Mr. P.K. Bhaduri, Government Advocate S.B.: Hon'ble Mr. Justice Prashant Kumar Mishra Order On Board 13.10.2015 Heard.

(2) Challenge in this petition is to the impugned order dated 08.09.2015, whereby, the petitioner, who is working on the post of Assistant Teacher, has been rationalized and posted from Government Primary School, Malidih, Block Kasdole to Govenrment Primary School, Chakravay, Block Simga.

(3) At the very outset, learned counsel for the petitioner would submit that the petitioner may be permitted to make a representation before the respondent authorities raising his grievances in respect of his

posting.

(4) No objection from the other side.

(5) Looking to the aforesaid submission of learned counsel for the petitioner, the writ petition is disposed of with a direction to the petitioner to make a representation before the respondent authorities within a period of 15 days and thereafter, the competent authorities is directed to consider and decide his representation in accordance with law, as early as possible, preferably within a period of 4 weeks from the date of submission of certified copy of this order. (6) It is made clear that this Court has not expressed any opinion on the merits of the case and the respondent authorities shall consider and decide the representation of the petitioner in accordance with law on its own merits.

Sd/- J u d g e (Prashant Kumar Mishra) Shyna