← Library
High Court Of ChhattisgarhWPS/3720/2015disposed off

Smt. Chandrakiran Sahu v. State Of Chhattisgarh

2015-10-14Hon'Ble Shri Justice Prashant Kumar Mishra2 pages

NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH, BILASPUR WPS No. 3720 of 2015 • Smt. Chandrakiran Sahu W/o B.P. Sahu, Aged About 34 Years Working As Assistant Teacher, Panchayat, Govt. Primary School, Naya Kharve, Block Kasdole, District Baloda Bazar Bhatapara Chhattisgarh ---- Petitioner

Versus

1. State Of Chhattisgarh Thorugh Secretary, Panchayat Welfare Department, Mahandi Bhawan, Mantralaya, Naya Raipur, District Raipur Chhattisgarh

2. Chief Executive OfÏcer, Zila Panchayat, Baloda Bazar Bhatapara, Chhattisgarh

3. Block Education OfÏcer, Kasdole, District Baloda Bazar Bhatapara Chhattisgarh ---- Respondent For Petitioner Mr. Kamlesh Prasad Sahu, Advocate For Respondent/State Mr. Dheeraj Wankhede, Government Advocate Hon'ble Shri Justice Prashant Kumar Mishra Order On Board 14/10/2015 Heard.

(2) Challenge in this petition is to the impugned order dated 08.09.2015, whereby, the petitioner, who is working on the post of Assistant Teacher (Panchayat), has been rationalized and posted from Government Primary School, Naya Kharve, Block Kasdole to Government Primary School, Sarkhor, Block Balodabazar.

(3) At the very outset, learned counsel for the petitioner would submit that the petitioner may be permitted to make a representation before the respondent authorities raising his grievances in respect of

her posting.

(4) No objection from the other side.

(5) Looking to the aforesaid submission of learned counsel for the petitioner, the writ petition is disposed of with a direction to the petitioner to make a representation before the respondent authorities within a period of 15 days and thereafter, the competent authorities is directed to consider and decide her representation in accordance with law, as early as possible, preferably within a period of 4 weeks from the date of submission of certified copy of this order. (6) It is made clear that this Court has not expressed any opinion on the merits of the case and the respondent authorities shall consider and decide the representation of the petitioner in accordance with law on its own merits.

Sd/- J u d g e (Prashant Kumar Mishra) Shyna