← Library
High Court Of ChhattisgarhWPS/3718/2015disposed off

Smt. Janaki Bai v. Hindustan Steel Works Construction Limited

2015-10-14Hon'Ble Shri Justice Prashant Kumar Mishra2 pages

NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH, BILASPUR WPS No. 3718 of 2015 • Smt. Janaki Bai widow of late Roop Ram, Aged About 55 Years R/o Village Kolhiapuri, Post Pisegaon, Tahsil And District Durg, (Chhattisgarh) ---- Petitioner

Versus

1. Hindustan Steel Works Construction Limited Through Its Chairman- CumManaging Director, 5/1, Commercial Road, Hastings, Kolkata (West Bengal)

2. Hindustan Steel Works Construction Limited, Through General Manager, Bhilai, District Durg (Chhattisgarh) (Local Office) ---- Respondents And WPS No. 3719 Of 2015 • Kanhaiya Lal S/o Shri Bodhi Ram, Aged About 61 Years R/o Bajrang Para House No. 56, Ward No.8, Kohka, Bhiali, District Durg (Chhattisgarh), (Date of V. R. 09.06.2000) ---- Petitioner Vs

1. Hindustan Steel Works Construction Limited Through Its Chairman- CumManaging Director, 5/1, Commercial Road, Hastings, Kolkata (West Bengal)

2. Hindustan Steel Works Construction Limited, Through General Manager, Bhilai, District Durg (Chhattisgarh) (Local Office) ---- Respondents And WPS No. 3723 Of 2015 • Smt. Amrika Bai W/o Krishna Ram Janghel, Aged About 55 Years R/o. Village Bhuteda, Post Devribhat, Tahsil Khairagarh, District Rajnandgaon (Chhattisgarh), ---- Petitioner Vs

1. Hindustan Steel Works Construction Limited Through Its Chairman-CumManaging Director, 5/1, Commercial Road, Hastings, Kolkata ( West Bengal),

2. Hindustan Steel Works Construction Limited, Through General Manager, Bhilai, District Durg (Chhattisgarh) ( Local Office),

---- Respondents For Petitioners :

Shri Uttam Pandey, Advocate For Respondents :

Shri Vinod Deshmukh, Advocate Hon'ble Shri Justice Prashant Kumar Mishra Order On Board 14/10/2015

1. At the very outset, learned counsel for the parties would fairly and jointly submit that the matter in issue is covered by the order passed by this Court in the matters of Janwadi Mazdoor Ekta Kendra (W.P. No.2/2001, decided on 28-04-2005), Hindustan Steelworks Construction Ltd. & others Vs. Smt. Kiran Sahu & others (W.A. No.185/2007, decided on 03.02.2015), and Rudal Yadav Vs. Hindusthan Steelworks Contruction Ltd. & others {W.P.(S) No.3499/2006, decided on 11.02.2015}. They would submit that the present writ petitions may also be decided in the same terms.

2. According to the learned counsel for the respondents, an amount of Rs.4,99,767.12 to the petitioner Smt. Janki Bai in WPS No.3718 of 2015, Rs.3,27,933.95 to the petitioner Kanhaiya Lal in WPS No.3719 of 2015 and Rs.9,34,947.46 to the petitioner Smt. Amrika Bai in WPS No.3723 of 2015 towards the retiral dues have already been paid to the petitioners under the Voluntary Retirement Scheme.

3. For the foregoing, the present writ petitions are also disposed of in terms of the order passed by this Court in Rudal Yadav (supra) {W.P.(S) No.3499/2006}.

4. Copy of the order passed in Rudal Yadav (supra) {W.P.(S) No.3499/2006} be kept in the record of these writ petitions. Sd/- JUDGE Prashant Kumar Mishra Ashu