Smt. D. S. Verma v. The State Of Chhattisgarh
NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH, BILASPUR WPS No. 3859 of 2015 Smt. D. S. Verma W/o Shri S. P. Verma, Aged About 52 Years Permanent R/o H. 58, D N K Colony, Kondagaon, At Present R/o Primary Health Center, Bunagaon, Tahsil And Distt. Kondagaon (Chhattisgarh) ---- Petitioner
Versus
1. The State Of Chhattisgarh Through Its Secretary, Health And Family Welfare Department, Mantralaya, Distt. Raipur (Chhattisgarh)
2. The Collector Kondagaon, Distt. Kondagaon (Chhattisgarh)
3. Ku. Mamta Churendra, Up Swastha Kendra, Chimdee, Vikas Khand Kondagaon Distt. Kondagaon (Chhattisgarh)
4. The Commissioner, Bastar Division, Jagdalpur, Distt. Bastar (Chhattisgarh) ---- Respondents For Petitioners:
Mr. Parag Kotecha, Advocate.
For Respondents:
Mr. Ashutosh Pandey, Panel Lawyer.
Hon'ble Shri Justice Sanjay K. Agrawal Order On Board 28/10/2015 (1) In this petition, the petitioner, who is working as Women Health Worker at Primary Health Center, Bunagaon, Vikas Khand Kondagaon, has challenged the transfer order dated 20.07.2015, whereby she has been transferred from Primary Health Centre, Bunagaon, Vikas Khand, Kondagaon to Up Swastha Kendra Chimdi, Vikas Khand, Kondagaon on administrative grounds. (2) In view of the Clause 4 of the State Government's transfer policy dated 1-7-2015 for the year 2015-16, on the request made by
learned counsel for the petitioner, the petitioner is permitted to withdraw the writ petition with liberty to pursue the representation. (3) The authority before whom the representation lies under clause 4 of the transfer policy dated 1-7-2015 shall take the decision in the matter at the earliest, preferably within a period of six weeks from the date of presentation of certified copy of this order. (4) It is made clear that this Court has not expressed any opinion on the merits of the case and the respondent authorities shall decide the matter, on its own merits, strictly in accordance with law, without treating any observation made in this order, as opinion on the merits of the case.
(5) Accordingly, the writ petition is dismissed as withdrawn with the aforesaid liberty.
Sd/- (Sanjay K. Agrawal) Judge D/-