High Court Of ChhattisgarhWPS/140/2017disposed off

Surajlal Mandavi v. State Of Chhattisgarh

2017-01-12Hon'Ble Shri Justice P. Sam Koshy2 pages

NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH, BILASPUR W.P.

( S ) No.

of 201 Surajlal Mandavi, aged about 52 years, S/o Gokul Ram Mandavi, Lecturer, Government Higher Secondary School, Keshkal, Block Keshkal, Distt. Kondagaon (C.G.) ---- Petitioner

Versus

1. State of Chhattisgarh, Through the Secretary, School Education Department, Mahanadi Bhawan, New Raipur (C.G.)

2. The District Education Officer, Kondagaon, District Kabirdham (C.G.)

3. Joint Director, Treasury, Account & Pension, Kondagaon, Division, Distt. Kondagaon (C.G.) ---- Respondents For Petitioner : Shri Rahul Mishra, Advocate.

Respondents : Shri Gary Mukhopadhyaya, Dy. Govt.

Advocate.

Hon'ble Shri Justice Sanjay K. Agrawal Order On Board /0 1 /201 Heard.

(1) Present writ petition has been filed seeking relief for direction to the respondents for issuance of two advance increments to the petitioner after completion of B.Ed. Examination on his own expenses, during service.

(2) Learned counsel for the parties i.e. petitioner as well as respondents submits the issue involved in the instant writ petition has already been adjudicated upon by this Court in W.P. (S) No.4680/2014 {Hem Lal Sahu Vs. State of Chhattisgarh & others) decided on

30.10.2014.

(3) Learned counsel for the petitioner as well as learned counsel for the respondents does not dispute the fact that nature of relief sought for by the petitioners is similar to W.P.(S) No.4680/2014 (4) Accordingly, accepting the submissions raised by the learned counsel for the petitioner as well respondents, this writ petition is also disposed of in terms of order rendered by this Court in W.P. (S) No.4680/2014, decided on 30.10.2014. However, the respondent No. 2, after due verification, if it finds that case of the petitioner is also identical to the petitioner in W.P. (S) No.4680/2014, shall pass appropriate order in favour of the petitioner within a period of 90 days from the date of receipt of certified copy of this order.

(5) With the aforesaid observations, the writ petition stands finally disposed of.

Sd/- (P. Sam Koshy) Judge D/-