High Court Of ChhattisgarhWPC/63/2017withdrawn

A.C.C.Ltd. v. State Of Chhattisgarh

2017-01-10Hon'Ble Shri Justice Prashant Kumar Mishra2 pages

NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH, BILASPUR WPC No. 61 of 2017

1. Ultratech Cement Limited A Company Registered Under The Provisions of The Companies Act, 1956 And Having Its Registered OfÏce At 'B' Wing, Ahura Centre, 2nd Floor, Mahakali Caves Road, Andheri ( East) Mumbai- 400 093 ( Maharashtra) And a Cement Plant/ Unit At Hirmi Cement Works Hirmi, Pin 493195 Distt. Raipur, (Chhattisgarh) Through Its Authorized Representative.

2. Shri Ashish Rameshwar Panpalia, S/o Shri Rameshwar Sangidas Panpalia, Aged 48 Years R/o Ultratech Cement, Hirmi Cement Works, Hirmi, Pin 493195, Distt. Raipur, (Chhattisgarh) ---- Petitioner

Versus

1. State Of Chhattisgarh Through Mineral Resource Department, Mahanadi Bhawan, Naya Raipur, 492002, (Chhattisgarh)

2. Union Of India, Through The Secretary, Ministry Of Mines, Government Of India, Shastri Bhawan, New Delhi -110001 ---- Respondent And WPC No. 63 Of 2017 • A.C.C. Ltd. a Public Limited Company having Its Registered OfÏce At Cement House, 121, Maharshi Karve Road, Mumbai And having One Of Its Cement Units At Jamul Cement Works, P. O. Jamul, District Durg (Chhattisgarh) Through Its Authorized Signatory Sunil Gupta, Director, Jamul Cement Works, Jamul Distt. Durg (Chhattisgarh) ---- Petitioner Vs

1. State Of Chhattisgarh Through The Secretary, Mineral Resource Department, Mantralaya, Mahanadi Bhawan, Naya Raipur (Chhattisgarh)

2. Union Of India, Through The Secretary, Ministry Of Mines, Government Of India, Shastri Bhawan, New Delhi 110 001 ---- Respondent

For Petitioners Mr. Ashish Shrivastava, Advocate For Respondent/State Mr. Ramakant Mishra, Dy. AG Hon'ble Shri Justice Prashant Kumar Mishra Order On Board 10/1/2017

1. Heard.

2. In view of subsequent filing of fresh petition challenging the vires of Rule 8(4) of the Minerals (Other than Atomic and Hydro Carbons Energy Minerals) Concession Rules, 2016, learned counsel for the petitioners seeks permission of this Court to withdraw these writ petitions.

3. Permission granted.

4. Accordingly, the writ petitions are dismissed, as withdrawn. Sd/- Judge (Prashant Kumar Mishra) Shyna