Man Singh Dhruw v. Lakhanlal Satnami

W.P.(C)No.117/2017 NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH, BILASPUR Writ Petition (C) No.117 of 2017 Man Singh Dhruw, S/o Shri Ram Dhruw, aged about 52 years, by Caste Gond (belonging to Scheduled Tribes), R/o Palari, Tahsil and Police Station Palari, Civil and Revenue District Baloda BazarBhatapara (C.G.) ---- Petitioner

Versus

1. Lakhanlal Satnami, aged about 59 years, S/o Rungu Satnami, R/o Palari, Tahsil and Police Station Palari, Civil and Revenue District Baloda Bazar-Bhatapara (C.G.)

2. State of Chhattisgarh, Through the Secretary, Department of Revenue, Secretariat, New Rajdhani, Raipur, District Raipur (C.G.)

3. The Collector, Baloda Bazar, District Baloda Bazar-Bhatapara (C.G.)

4. The Sub Divisional Officer (Revenue), Baloda Bazar, District Baloda Bazar-Bhatapara (C.G.)

5. The Tahsildar, Tahsil Palari, District Baloda Bazar-Bhatapara (C.G.)

6. The Patwari of Village Palari Halka Palari, Revenue Circle and Tahsil Palari, District Baloda Bazar-Bhatapara (C.G.)

7. The Revenue Inspector, Palari, District Baloda Bazar-Bhatapara (C.G.)

8. Guddu, S/o Lakhanlal Satnami, aged about 19 years, R/o Palari, Tahsil Palari, District Baloda Bazar-Bhatapara (C.G.) ---- Respondents For Petitioner:

Mr. Janak Ram Verma, Advocate.

For State/Respondents No.2 to 7: - Mr. Gary Mukhopadhyay, Deputy Govt.

Advocate and Mr. S.M. Ali, Panel Lawyer.

Hon'ble Shri Justice Sanjay K. Agrawal Order On Board 07/07/2017

1. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the Additional Commissioner, Raipur Division, Raipur, has passed order against

W.P.(C)No.117/2017 the petitioner and by virtue of that order, respondent No.1 is disturbing his possession.

2. Since the petitioner is claiming interference in his possession by respondent No.1 herein, he is at liberty to institute civil suit and also to make application for claiming temporary injunction.

3. With the aforesaid observation, the writ petition stands finally disposed of. No order as to cost(s).

Sd/- (Sanjay K. Agrawal) Judge Soma