Smt. Kiranmayee Nayak v. State Of C.G. And ORS

Q23

IN THE HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR (QGJ

WHC) News} [2012 "Wu PFTmONER 6'"

/ obom 46 years, Mayor, Mayor of fhe t f W} The Mayor Permanem R/o Noyek "I, Tatyepora, Advocwe'

Chamber, Pmsemedby\2fgx§2::w .. -- G.E.Road. Rcipur, Chhbtti'sgorh.

Da'ed............

Versus

-.

/"'

'"w'

1.

The State of Chhossisgam, through RESPONDENTS Urban Administration '

The Secretory, Development Department D.K,S.

/ and Mantralaya, Raipur (CG) Bhawan, Corporation, Raipur, , 2.

The Municipal Through : The Commissioner, Municipal / Raipur (C.G.) Corporation, WRIT PETITION UNDER ARTtCLE 226(227 OF THE CONSTlTUTlON OF lNDlA FOR ISSUENCE OF A-WRIT lN THE NATURE OF MANDAMUS, CERTlORARl OR ANY OTHER WRIT lN THE LIKE NATURE M M--,.._.W___ _ ,....._ *MW

m7 Wm mmmw a'smm'

m¥®a S B Hon'ble Shri Justice Pra'mant Kumar Mishra 24.3.2015 Ms. Priya Mishra, Advocate for the petitioner.

Shri Arun Sao, Dy. Advocate General for the State/respondent No.1.

Shri Pankaj Agrawal, Adv )cate for respondent No.2. Learned counsel for the p atitioner pleads no instructions. t .

Since no other counsel is; appearing to press this writ petition nor any representation is made, this Court is left with no other option but to dismiss the writ petition for'want of prosecution. Accordingly.

the writ petition is dismissed for want of prosecution.

.r Sd//- Prashant Kumar Mishra ASHU Judge Mbak3