Smt. Kumari Bai v. State Of Chhattisgarh
NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH, BILASPUR Writ Petition (S) No. 412 of 2017
1. Smt. Kumari Bai W/o Late Shri Rikhiram Sahu Aged About 45 Years Working As Cook Presently Posted On Government Primary School Medha, Tahsil & Block Dongargaon, District Rajnandgaon, Chhattisgarh
2. Smt. Kumari Bai W/o Shri Ghanshyam Sahu Aged About 46 Years Working As Cook Presently Posted On Government Middle School Sonesarar, Tahsil & Block Dongargaon, District Rajnandgaon, Chhattisgarh
3. Smt. Mantora Bai W/o Shri Kunj Lal Belsariya Aged About 42 Years Working As Cook Presently Posted On Government Middle School Parna, Tahsil & Block Dongargaon, District Rajnandgaon, Chhattisgarh
4. Smt. Inkunwar Sahu W/o Santram Aged About 36 Years Working As Cook Presently Posted On Government Middle School Banhardi, Tahsil & Block Dongargaon, District Rajnandgaon, Chhattisgarh
5. Smt. Alka Bai Thakur W/o Baliram Thakur Aged About 42 Years Working As Cook Presently Posted On Government Middle School Ratapayli, Tahsil & Block Dongargaon, District Rajnandgaon, Chhattisgarh ---- Petitioners
Versus
1. State Of Chhattisgarh Through Secretary, Department Of Schools Education Development, Mantralay, Mahanadi Bhawan, Police Station- Mandir Hasaud, New Raipur, Chhattisgarh
2. Director, Lok Sikshan Sanchanalaya, Indrawati Bhawan- New Raipur, District- Raipur, Chhattisgarh
3. Secretary Labour Officers, Indrawati Bhawan- New Raipur, District- Raipur, Chhattisgarh
4. Collector, Rajnandgaon, District- Rajnandgaon, Chhattisgarh
5. District Education Officer, Rajnandgaon, District Rajnandgaon, Chhattisgarh
6. Labour Office Rajnandgaon, District- Rajnandgaon, Chhattisgarh
7. Block Education Officer, Dongargaon, District Rajnandgaon,
Chhattisgarh ---- Respondents For Petitioners :
Shri Amit Kumar Sharma, Advocate For State :
Shri Dhiraj Wankhede, Govt. Advocate Hon'ble Shri Justice Sanjay K. Agrawal Order On Board 25/01/2017 (1) Learned counsel appearing for the petitioners seeks permission of this Court to withdraw this petition with liberty to file afresh petition in accordance with law.
(2) Prayer is allowed.
(3) Accordingly, the writ petition is dismissed as withdrawn with the aforesaid liberty. No order as to cost(s).
Sd/- (Sanjay K. Agrawal) Judge L/-