High Court Of ChhattisgarhWPS/3678/2018disposed off

N. P. Mishra v. Chhattisgarh Infrastructure Development Corporation

2018-05-15Hon'Ble Shri Justice P. Sam Koshy2 pages

-1NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR WPS No. 3678 of 2018 N. P. Mishra S/o Late Shri Acche Lal Mishra, Aged About 71 Years Senior Accountant, Raigarh Depot, V. R. S. 2003, R/o Triveni Nagar, In front Of Geeta Palace, Jabadapara, Sarkanda, Bilaspur, P.S. Bilaspur, District- Bilaspur, Chhattisgarh.

---- Petitioner

Versus

1. Chhattisgarh Infrastructure Development Corporation (Parivahan Prabhag), Through Its Managing Director, Shastri Chowk, Raipur, Chhattisgarh.

2. Madhya Pradesh Road Transport Corporation, Through Its Managing Director, Head Office Habibganj, Bhopal (Madhya Pradesh). ---Respondents For Petitioner :

Mr. Vivek Kumar Agrawal, Advocate For Respondent-CIDC :

Mr. Soumya Rai, Advocate under instructions of Mr. Ashish Shrivastava, Advocate Hon'ble Shri Justice P. Sam Koshy Order on Board 15/05/2018

1. Counsel for the petitioner submits that an identical issue came up before the Coordinate Bench on 15.11.2017 and the same has been disposed of with a direction to the petitioner to make a fresh representation to the respondent No.2 and it was further directed that respondent No.2 shall on receipt the representation take a prompt decision.

2. Counsel for the petitioner submits that present writ petition also may be disposed of in similar terms as the grievance raised by the petitioner is identical.

3. Given the facts and circumstances, this Court feels that the prayer made by the petitioner to be fair and reasonable. Accordingly, the present writ petition also is disposed of in similar terms as has been passed in the WPS No. 6005/2017 vide order dated 15.11.2017. Accordingly, the petitioner is at liberty to move a representation

-2before the respondent No.2, before whom the claim of the previous set of petitions were under process.

4. On submission of the representation by the petitioner, the respondents as expeditiously as possible preferably within a period of two months shall verify and if the case of the petitioner are found similar to the petitioners in WPS No. 6005/2017, their claim shall also be processed along with the similarly placed persons, whose writ petitions stand decided vide orders dated 04.07.2011 and 16.12.2012 in WPS No. 6510/2009 and WA No. 419/2011.

5. With the aforesaid direction, the writ petition accordingly stands disposed of at the motion stage.

Sd/- (P. Sam Koshy) Judge Ved