Hanuman Agrawal v. State Of Chhattisgarh

NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH, BILASPUR WPC No. 233 of 2017

1. Hanuman Agrawal S/o Late Shri Gopiram Agrawal, Aged About 65 Years R/o Gandhiganj, Sawariya Building, Raigarh, Tahsil & District Raigarh (Chhattisgarh)

2. Sagarmal Agrawal, S/o Late Shri Gopiram Agrawal, Aged About 73 Years R/o Gandhiganj, Sawariya Building, Raigarh, Tahsil & District Raigarh (Chhattisgarh)

3. Ramkumar Agrawal S/o Late Shri Gopiram Agrawal, Aged About 75 Years Throgh : Its Power Of Attorney Holder Sagarmal Agrawal, S/o Late Shri Gopiram Agrawal (Petitioner No. 2), R/o Gandhiganj, Sawariya Building, Raigarh, Tahsil & District Raigarh (Chhattisgarh)

4. Purshotam Agrawal S/o Late Malturam Agrawal, Aged About 55 Years R/o Gandhiganj, Sawariya Building, Raigarh, Tahsil & District Raigarh (Chhattisgarh) ---- Petitioners

Versus

1. State Of Chhattisgarh Through : The Secretary, Department Of Urban Administration And Development, Mahanadi Bhawan, Mantralaya, Naya Raipur, Tahsil & District Raipur Chhattisgarh.

2. Director, Urban Administration And Development, Indrawati Bhawan, Mantralaya, Naya Raipur, Tahsil & District Raipur, (Chhattisgarh)

3. Municipal Corporation, Riagarh, Through : Its Commissioner, Municipal Corporation Raigarh, Tahsil & District Raigarh (Chhattisgarh)

4. Mayor-In- Council, Municipal Corporation Raigarh, Through Its Mayor, Municipal Corporation, Raigarh, Tahsil & District Raigarh (Chhattisgarh)

5. Deputy Registrar, Office Of Registrar, Office Of Registrar, Raigarh (Chhattisgarh) ---- Respondents For Petitioners : Shri Sourabh Sharma, Advocate. For respondents No. 1, 2 & 5 : Shri Shashank Thakur, Govt. Advocate. For resondents No. 3 & 4 : Shri H.B. Agrawal, Senior Advocate with Smt. Prabha Mishra, Advocate Shri Vinod Kumar Pandey, Commissioner, Nagar Nigam, Raigarh is also present in person.

Hon'ble Shri Justice Sanjay K. Agrawal Order On Board 19/0 9 /2017

(1) Counsel for the respondents No. 3 & 4, on instructions of Commissioner, Nagar Nigam, Raigarh, would submit that the petitioner will be paid compensation as per letter dated 7th September, 2017 issued by Deputy Registrar, Raigarh and the compensation will be paid @ 26,000/- per ₹ square meter.

(2) In view of that, counsel for the petitioner submits that no cause of action survives in the instant writ petition.

(3) Affidavit dated 29th August, 2017 is permitted to be withdrawn. (4) With the aforesaid observations, the writ petition stands finally disposed of. However, the respondent authorities are directed to consider and decide the petitioner's case expeditiously preferably within a period of three months from the date of receipt of certified copy of this order. Sd/- (Sanjay K. Agrawal) Judge D/-