Gyaneshwar Dewangan v. State Of Chhattisgarh And ANR.

THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATTO^ AT BILASPUR (C.G.) M.C.C.

No.

l^j 20015 Gyaneshwar Dewangan S/o PETITIONER Late Shri Laxman Dewangan APPUCAHT aged about years R/o ^»* / fti.^11^- ^^?:!i;;:- Vfllage Motipur, Ganeshpara , ward No.

Lane no.3 Rajnandgaon, District Rajnandgaon (C.G.)

VERSUS

1.

State of Chhattisgarh, RISPONDENTS Tfarough Secretary, Department of Urban Admimstration and development DKS Bhwan Raipur (C.G.) 2.

Municipal Corporation, Rajnand^ion, throu^i_its cominissioner, Murdcial corporation Rajnandgaon, \\ District Rajnandgaon (C.G.) APPLICATIOK FOR RESTQItATION OF TRE WMT PETITION r^MO.766^20^1 mSBBBSK»OKS'-1-2015 IB ITS ^ i^ ''ORIGmAL NUMBER ^^~ r

^SBT^qPiraTIt, yTd'M'ilii, RfrtWy Wq^Tg^TNi...tv\.C.&...\.!l.\.\.\.^-....^201 sn^%Traq> ( 'hl'uid^'l-l Hltidl'fl fsiA <RtWK ^iaRmgn^i an^i^ii R-<i+ wnsn^igiHN;

^sngR'gftaan^i S.B.LHON'BLE SHRI JUST1CE PRl 25.02.2015 Shri Ashok Patil, counsel for th Shri Rahul Tamaskar, P.L. for tl TINKER D1WAKER e applicant.

he State.

Heard on M.C.C. No.121/21]l15 which is an application for restoration of W.P.(S) No. 766/201)1 which was dismissed by this court vide order dated 08.01.2015 fc |r want of prosecution.

This is not opposed by couns] 3l forthe State.

For the reasons mentioned i| i the application, the same is allowed and W.P.(S) No.

766/20[11 is restored to its original number.

'

Sd/- Pritinker Diwaker Judge -I-'