Youth Empowerment And Education Development Society v. Union Of India
NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH, BILASPUR WPC No. 1427 of 2018
1. Youth Empowerment and Education Development Society, Ambikapur District Surguja (C.G.) through the Chairman, Bhupendra Tiwari S/o Shri Ramashankar Tiwari, aged about 38 years, R/o Kush Complex, Trikon Chowk, Bhatti Road, Ambikapur, District Surguja (C.G.)
2. Bajrangi Ojha S/o Shri Kapil Dev Ojha, aged about 42 years, R/o Mayapur, Near Panchdev Mandir, Ambikapur, District Surguja (C.G.) ---- Petitioners
Versus
1. Union of India through the Ministry of Labour and Employment, Directorate General of Employment and Training, New Delhi, India.
2. Ministry of Skill Development and Enterpreneurship Modular Employable Skills, RDAT, MSO, Building E-Wing, First Floor, DF Block, Sector - 1, Salt Lake, Kolkata (W.B.)
3. State of Chhattisgarh, through the Secretary, State Skill Development Authority, Raipur (C.G.)
4. Chief Executive Officer, Chhattisgarh State Skill Development Authority, Raipur (C.G.) --- Respondents For Petitioners :
Mr. Govind Dewangan, Advocate.
For Respondents/ State :
Mr. Ashish Surana, Panel Lawyer.
For Respondents - UoI :
Mr. Raj Kumar Gupta, standing counsel.
Hon'ble Shri Justice Sanjay K. Agrawal Order On Board 18/05/18 1.
Learned counsel appearing for the petitioners would submit that petitioners may be allowed to make additional representation before the respondent No. 4 for redressal of their grievance. 2.
I have heard learned counsel for the petitioners. 3.
The prayer appears to be fair and reasonable. 4.
Be that as it may, the petitioners are at liberty to make additional
representation before the respondent No. 4 for redressal of their grievance. On such representation being preferred, the said authority shall consider and decide the same expeditiously preferably within a period of four weeks from the date of receipt of copy of this order.
5.
It is made clear that this Court has not expressed any opinion on the merits of the matter.
6.
With the aforesaid observation, the writ petition stands finally disposed of. No order as to cost(s).
Sd/- (Sanjay K. Agrawal) Judge Priyanka