High Court Of ChhattisgarhWPS/600/2017disposed off

Yuvraj Singh v. State Of Chhattisgarh

2017-11-28Hon'Ble Shri Justice Prashant Kumar Mishra3 pages

NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH, BILASPUR WPS No. 600 of 2017 • Yuvraj Singh S/o Late Shri Prabhunath Singh, Aged About 32 Years Assistant Teacher (Panchayat) Presently Working On The Post Of Cluster Academic Coordinator At Circle Ramgarh, P. S. Janakpur, Block Bharatpur, Distt. Korea (Chhattisgarh) ---- Petitioner

Versus

1. State Of Chhattisgarh Through Its Secretary, School Education Department, Mantralay, Mahanadi Bhawan, Naya Raipur, Distt. Raipur (Chhattisgarh)

2. The Mission Director, State Project Officer, Rajiv Gandhi Shiksha Mission, Raipur, Distt. Raipur (Chhattisgarh)

3. District Mission Coordinator, Rajiv Gandhi Shiksha Mission, Baikunthpur, District Korea (Chhattisgarh)

4. District Education Officer, Baikunthpur, District Korea (Chhattisgarh)

5. Block Education Officer, Block Bharatpur, Distt. Korea (Chhattisgarh)

6. Chief Executive Officer, Janpad Panchayat, Bharatpur, District Korea (Chhattisgarh) ---- Respondent For Petitioner Shri A.S. Rajput, Advocate.

For Respondent No.1 Shri Rajendra Tripathi, P.L.

For Respondent No.2 Shri Awadh Tripathi, Advocate.

For Respondent No.3 Shri B.L. Sahu, Advocate.

Hon'ble Shri Justice Prashant Kumar Mishra

Order On Board 28/11/2017

1. By order Annexure P-1 petitioner was directed to work as Cluster Academic Coordinator at Ramgarh and he started carrying out the duties of the said post. However, by order Annexure P-3 Block Education Officer Bharatpur, District Korea has cancelled the said arrangement on the basis of some oral instruction issued by the District Mission Coordinator, Rajiv Gandhi Shiksha Mission, Baikunthpur.

2. Learned counsel for the respondent Nos. 2 & 3 would submit that the previous Cluster Academic Coordinator posted at Ramgarh proceeded on medical leave, therefore, the petitioner was directed to work temporarily and the order Annexure P-1 was not an order of appointment.

3. Considering the issue brought before this court and for the reason that the impugned order Annexure P-3 refers to some oral instruction issued by the District Mission Coordinator, Rajiv Gandhi Shiksha Mission, Baikunthpur, it would be appropriate that the said authority considers the issue on a representation filed by the petitioner.

4. Accordingly, the writ petition is disposed of with a direction that in the event, petitioner prefers a representation before the respondent No.3 against the impugned order Annexure P-3 dated 07.01.2017 passed by the Block Education Officer Bharatpur, District Korea within a period of 4 weeks from today, the said authority shall consider and decide the representation by speaking order at the earliest preferably within the next 2 months.

5. Till the representation is decided or for a period of three months from today, whichever is earlier the interim order passed earlier by this Court shall continue to operate in petitioner's favour.

6. Accordingly, the writ petition is disposed of with the aforesaid liberty.

Sd/- Judge Prashant Kumar Mishra Akhilesh