Dhaneshwar Kurre v. State Of Chhattisgarh

-1NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR Writ Petition (S) No. 3325 of 2021

1. Dhaneshwar Kurre S/o Shri Melu Ram Kurre Aged About 33 Years R/o Village Madwani, District Bilsapur Chhattisgarh

2. Jitendra Kumar Soni S/o Shri Dhanil Chand Aged About 25 Years R/o House No. 55 Mahaveer Chowk, Bhogahapara Ward No. 8, Shivrinarayan, Nawagarh, District Janjgir Champa Chhattisgarh

3. Manisha Bhardwaj D/o Jai Rammani Bhardwaj Aged About 28 Years R/o 34, Ward No. 15, Main Road, In Front Of Nagina Mosque, Tarbahar District Bilsapur Chhattisgarh

4. Balram S/o Shri Shivkiumar Sahu Aged About 29 Years R/o House No. 321, Ward No. 03, Ambedkar Nagar, Parpodi, District Bemetara Chhattisgarh

5. Avinash Yadav S/o Shri Sahoran Yadav Aged About 25 Years R/o Village Daija, District Bilsapur Chhattisgarh ---Petitioner(s)

Versus

1. State of Chhattisgarh Through Its Principal Secretary, Department of School Education, Mantralaya, Mahanadi Bhawan, Atal Nagar, Naya Raipur, District Raipur Chhattisgarh

2. Director Directorate of Public Instruction, Department of School Education, Indravati Bhawan, Block C, 1st Floor, Atal Nagar, Nawa Raipur, Raipur Chhattisgarh

3. Joint Director Directorate of Public Instruction, Department of School Education, Indravati Bhawan, Block C, 1st Floor, Atal Nagar, Nawa Raipur, Raipur Chhattisgarh

4. Chhattisgarh Professional Examination Board Through Its Secretary Shailendra Nagar, Raipur Chhattisgarh

5. District Education Officer Bilaspur District Bilsapur Chhattisgarh

6. District Education Officer Raipur District Raipur Chhattisgarh

7. District Education Officer Bemetara, District Bemetara Chhattisgarh ---Respondents For Petitioners :

Smt. Naushina Ali, Advocate.

For Respondent-State :

Shri Amrito Das, Addl. Advocate General.

Hon'ble Shri Justice P. Sam Koshy Order on Board 06.07.2021 .

1. The limited grievance that the petitioners have in the present writ petition is the inaction on the part of the respondents in not issuing a formal order

-2of appointment that is the posting order of the petitioners inspite of the petitioners being declared successful in the selection process for appointment to the post of Assistant Teacher Science as early as on 15.09.2020.

2. It is a case where the petitioners were subjected to a complete process of selection arising out of an advertisement dated 09.03.2019 and in due course of time the petitioners being successful were also called upon for document verification and counseling. That thereafter an order dated 15.09.2020 was issued informing the petitioners about they being selected and that the order of appointments would be issued soon after reopening of the schools. Provisional allotment letters/orders were also issued on 01.03.2021.

3. According to the petitioners, though the schools have started by way of online classes and appointments to the different categories have also been made from the same recruitment process, however till date appointment to the category to which the petitioners had applied have not been issued.

4. At this juncture the counsel for the State refers to Annexure P/6 and submits that it appears that the matter is under consideration at the secretariat level and a decision shall be taken at the earliest.

5. Given the facts and circumstances of the case and also taking note of the developments that have transpired in between so far as issuance of appointment orders to the other post to which the recruitment process were conducted from the same advertisement, the present writ petition as of now stands disposed of directing the respondents to take an appropriate decision in respect of issuance of the formal order of appointment and posting orders to the petitioners in accordance with law at the earliest

-3preferably within a period of 60 days from the date of receipt of copy of this order.

6. The writ petition accordingly stands disposed of. Sd/- (P. Sam Koshy) Judge inder