High Court Of ChhattisgarhWPS/795/2017disposed off

Ku. Poonam Singh Gaharwar v. State Of Chhattisgarh

2017-02-16Hon'Ble Shri Justice Sanjay K. Agrawal2 pages

NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH, BILASPUR Writ Petition (S) No.795 of 2017 Ku. Poonam Singh Gaharwar D/o Ram Murti Singh Gaharwar, Aged About 32 Years Supervisor, Child And Women Welfare Department, Sector Sonajori, Project Lailunga, District Raigarh (Chhattisgarh), R/o Village Sonajori, Block Lailunga, District Raigarh, (Chhattisgarh) ---- Petitioner

Versus

1. State Of Chhattisgarh Through: The Secretary, Department Of Women And Child Development, Mahanadi Bhawan, Naya Raipur, District Raipur, (Chhattisgarh)

2. The Commissioner, Women And Child Development, Naya Raipur, Indravati Bhawan, District Raipur (Chhattisgarh)

3. The Collector, Raigarh, District Raigarh, (Chhattisgarh)

4. District Program Officer, Women And Child Welfare Department, Raigarh, District Raigarh, (Chhattisgarh)

5. The Project Officer, Women And Child Welfare Project, Mukdega, Block Lailunga, Raigarh, District Raigarh, (Chhattisgarh) ---- Respondents For Petitioner : Shri A.K. Prasad, Advocate.

For State : Shri Gary Mukhopadhyay, Dy.G.A.

Hon'ble Shri Justice Sanjay K. Agrawal Order On Board 16/02/2017 (1) Heard.

(2) Learned counsel for the State/respondents submits that the impugned order dated 20.01.2017 passed by respondent No.3 i.e. Collector, Raigarh is appealable before the appellate

authority.

(3) After arguing for a fairly long time, learned counsel appearing for the petitioner submits that he may be permitted to prefer an appeal before the appellate authority within a period of two weeks from today.

(4) Prayer appears to be fair and reasonable.

(5) The petitioner is permitted to prefer an appeal before the appellate authority. If such appeal is filed by the petitioner within a period of two weeks from today and, in turn, the appellate authority shall consider and decide the same in accordance with law and on its own merit preferably within a period of three months after hearing of both the parties from the date of receipt of appeal of the petitioner along with copy of this order. (6) With the aforesaid observation, the writ petition stands finally disposed of. No order as to cost(s).

Sd/- (Sanjay K. Agrawal) Judge L/-