Smt. Premin Bai v. State Of Chhattisgarh And ORS.
This judgment came from a scanned document and its text layer is unreliable — words may be garbled. Check the original PDF before relying on any passage.
® MW gmgie @mch
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BILASPUR
W.P.(S) No.32'39/12 W Smt. Premin Bai W/o Late Hazarilahf Baghel R/o Near Sheetla Mandir, Sanjay Nagar, Raipur (CG)
VERSUS
1State of Chhattisgarh, Through the Secretary, Dept.
of Public Health Ls gg h Engineering, D.K.S.
Bhawan, .Rxh w q wb.
.2 Shastri Chowk, Raipur (CG) 2/Executive Engineer (Vi/Ya) mo"
Division, Dept.
of Public Health jEngineering, Rajnandgaon (CG) / 3Smt. Ganga Bai Baghel W/o.
Late Hazari Lal Baghel, R/oi Chourasiya Colony, Aakash Kirana Store Post ("f/Office Sunder Nagar, Raipur (CG) 4Sanyukta Sanchalak, Kosh Lekha Avam Pension, Raipur (CG)\ WRIT PETITION UNDER ARTICLE 226 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA FOR ISSUANCE OF WRIT IN THE NATURE OF MANDAMUS AND ANY OTHER ORDER OR DIRECTION AS DEEMED FIT
W mwf@)w3%39gqm WW (W) MWW am m ma? 11%?! m WW %®®1§K $31Taw3néw Shrivastava J.
SB : Hon'ble Shri Manindra Mohan 06-09-201 2 Shri Sudeep Johri, counsel or the petitioner.
Shri Arun Sao, Governmen Advocate for the State/ respondents 1, 2 and 4 on advance copy.
Heard.
hed this Court for issuance of direction to The petitioner has approac al dues of deceased Government Servant official respondents to divide retir - Hazarilal between the petitioner and respondent No.3 in equai ratio on the alive, he had applied for nomination in submission that whiie Hazarilal s favour of the petitioner.
Who would be entitled to et retiral dues, is essentially dependent upon the nomination made by th Government Servant.
if the ciaim of the petitioner is that before death, H zarilal had requested for change of name of nomination and on that basis, t e petitioner is entitted to get equai ratio of to approach the concerned authority by n retiral dues, it is for the petitio the absence of any approach made by n making suitabie representation.
the petitioner to the concerned a thority, i am not inciined to entertain this petition at this stage.
Leaving the petitioner work out her remedy by moving representation before the con erned authority, this petition is hnaiiy disposed off.
Manindra Mohan Shrivastava Judge Dupii _"_L