Girja Sai v. State Of Chhattisgarh

HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH, BILASPUR Order Sheet WPCR No. 289 of 2018 Girja Sai S/o Shri Shivcharan Sai, Aged About 35 Years R/o Ward No. 6, Kabir Mandir Near Sahu Dharamshala, Kasdol, Post - Kasdol, Tahsil Kasdol, District Balodabazar-Bhatapara,Chhattisgarh.

---Petitioner

Versus

1. State of Chhattisgarh through Secretary, Department of Home, Mantralaya, Mahanadi Bhawan, Naya Raipur Chhattisgarh.

2. Inspector General of Police, Raipur Range, District Raipur Chhattisgarh.

3. Superintendent of Police, District Baloda Bazar Bhatapara Chhattisgarh., District : Balodabazar-Bhathapara, Chhattisgarh

4. Station House Officer, Police Station Kasdol, District Baloda Bazar Bhatapara Chhattisgarh.

5. Dr. Antram Banjare, S/o Late Shri Samay Lal Banjare, Aged About 60 Years R/o Shivari Narayan, Thana Mod, District Janjgir Champa Chhattisgarh. --- Respondents 16.05.2018 Mr. Vinay Pandey, counsel for the appellant. Mr. Sangharsh Pandey, Panel Lawyer, for the State. Heard.

By this writ petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, the petitioner has sought for registration of FIR against respondent No.5. It is alleged that a report was made by respondent No.5 Dr. Antram Banjare that the petitioner has abducted his daughter i.e., wife of the petitioner and is kept in his custody.

Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the said complaint is forged and therefore the fair investigation be carried out.

The Court is unable to understand that what relief has been actually claimed by the petitioner. The respondent

No.5 who has lodged the complaint is not before the Court. It is for the Court to investigate and find out that who has abducted the daughter of respondent No.5 who may be the wife of petitioner and if the petitioner is found culprit, then the police is also free to take action.

With the observation, this petition stands disposed. Sd/- GOUTAM BHADURI JUDGE R a o