C.S.E.B.And Another v. Smt.Shyama Bai And Others

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BILASPUR,

CHHATTISGARH ^ First Appeal No. ll^ /200S Chhattisgarh State Electricity Board, Through -ChiefEngineer Bilaspur, (C.G.) Officer-in-charge, C.S.E.B., Kataghora, Tehsil-Kataghora, Distt.Korba, (C.G.) AppelIants/Defendants / .5/^

VERSUS

/ .^/ /^y/ Smt. Shyam Bai, W/o- Rup Sai Kanvar Aged about 65 years, Raj Kumar S/0 Mahettar Ram Aged 12 year ^- '^ ^"

.^" .a?

fw' y Ay ^ "..'/'

Manoj Kumar S/0 Mahettar Ram Aged 8 year ^ Respondent No. 2 &3 are Minor, Through- Grand Mother ^All are resident ofGramNawagaon, P.S.-Kataghora, Distt. Korba, (C.G.) /,. ^ StatecyfChhattisgarh, Collector, Korba(C.G.) Respondents/Plaintiffs FIRST APPEAL UNDER SECTION 96 OF THE CODE OF CIVIL PROCEDURE CODE

./•-;» :^.

'^ \'w ^. vy/ "^aS^T:

n-'%< COURT OF CHHATTISGARH ATBILASPUR First Appeal No. 47 of 2005 Chhattisgarh State Electricity Board and another Appellants

VERSUS

Respondents Smt Shyam Bai and others First Appeal under Section 96 of the Code of Civil Procedure.

Present:

Nonejfo^tt-ieappellants.

.

ShrcMKSBChandel, Panel Lawyer for the State.

SB:

Hon'ble Mr. Inder Singh Uboweja, J.

ORDER

(20thFebruary,2015) (1) When the matter is called out for hearing today second time, no one appears on beha!fofthe appellants.

(2) Being aggrieved by the judgment and decree dated 17.11.2004 passed in CivilSuit No. 56A/2004 by the District Judge, Korba, the appellants prefer this appeal.

(3) In absence of any representation on behalf of the appellants, this Court has left with no option except to dismiss the appeal for want of prosecution.

(4) Consequently, the appeal is dismissed for want of prosecution. Sd/.

A'S£18hub^a