← Library
High Court Of ChhattisgarhMA/222/2005dismissed

Sneh Kumar Singh Died Through Lrs And Others v. Indraman Singh And Others

2016-12-23Hon'Ble Shri Justice Chandra Bhushan Bajpai6 pages

This judgment came from a scanned document and its text layer is unreliable — words may be garbled. Check the original PDF before relying on any passage.

IIN THE HIGH COURT OFBQDICATURE AT BILASPUR FC.G.1 c"

MISC. CIVIL APPEAL N0. <2rx'2~ OF 2005 • '-ANTS /l] 1 Sneh Kumar Singh S/o Tej Singh, aged 63 years.

__-_-- ;\/ 2] Rahi Singh W/o Yashwant Kumar Singh, aged 56 years.

3] Rajesh Kumar Singh S/o Yashwant Kumar Singh, aged 33 years.

4] Rakesh Kumar Yashwant Kumar Singh, aged years.

> ^'

5] Sanat Kumar Singh S/o Tej Singh, aged 53 years.

6] Upamawati Singh W/o Tej Singh, aged 80 years.

7] Vindhyawasini Tej Singh, aged 50 years.

8] Madhuri Tej aged 55 years.

9] Kumari Bai W/o -leet Singh, aged 75 years.

10] Shashant Jeet aged 56 years.

11] Ramakant Singh S/o Jeet Singh, aged 48 years.

Purnima Jeet aged 53 years.

Ku. Rekha Singh D/o Jeet Singh, aged 44 years.

Ku. Sunita Singh D/o Jeet Singh, aged 44 years.

15] Ku. Pratima Singh D/o~Jeet Singh, 16] Ku. Sarita Singh D/o Jeet Singh, aged 38 years.

\7~\ Roop Singh S/o Bhan Singh, aged 72 years.

^) 1§.] Anoop Singh S/o Gautam Singh, aged 65 years.

1^9] Dhirendra Smgh Gautam ''

Singh, aged 52 years,

^® nflf< IIN THE HIGHCOURTOFgBblGATUf^ ATBILASPURFC.G.1 MISC CIVILAPPE^LNQ. (24^z-OF 2005 ,»-T^~ yl~\ ] Sneh KumarSingh S/o Tej Singh,, APPELLANTS 3r l(a) Smt. Vijay Laxmi aged about 63 years, wife oflate Sneh Kum.ar Singh ilt ^Q)) ;Smt.

Miaaxi Singh D/o Late Sneh Kumar Shigh, aged about 42 years, <0 il ^f%f(c) 'Sangeeta D/o Late Sneh Kumar Singh, SB , ;

agpd 35 years, h, l^(d) Namita D/o Late Sneh Kumar Singh, aged about 32 years, '

AU resident viUage and Post Multnula, TahsU Dist-rict Jangjir-Cham.pa (C.G.) i e.i 1, "ci'gcta^.^'.j'-'yxTai-a";

Kumari Bai W/o Jeet S.irigh, aged 75 years.

, • 10] Shashant Singh S/o Jeet Singh^, a'ged 56 years.

11] RamakantSingh S/o 3eet;Singh, aged48 years.

Purnima Jeet aged 53years.

Ku. RekhaSingh D/o Jeefe Singh, aged44years.

/:

Ku. Sunita Singh D/o Jeet |Singh, .

aged 44 years.

':

, 15] Ku. Pratima Singh D/o JeetjSingh, :

• .

.

.••'.."• ..:••;

15] Ku. Sarita: Singh D/o JeetSingh, aged 38years.

j ;

Roop Singh S/o Bhan Singhj aged 72 years. '

:

•' '"• :/ :,i'l:' ::'^ Arioop Singh S/o Gautam gjHgh,^ aged'65yeaFs.

• : -::.;- '-i::s|£!tfs; ^ :

Dhirendra f Singh •,'S/O a|BB|l Singh, aged 52years, '

si»E» ^^^^i^iS'^St^Sfctwi 'SSi^&^ii^iss^Sss

Digpal Dewa aged 56 years'.

2,0] Shanker Singh S/o Dewa 21] Sl.

No.

to resident of at village and Post Mulmula, Tahsil Pamgarh, District Janjgir-Champa Kumari Singh W/o Bir Singh, aged 58 years, 22] 23] Chandrakant Singh S/o Bir Singh, ag6d 35 years, 24] Dhir Singh S/o Bhan Singh, aged 64 years.

2§J c"

Shiv Singh S/o Bhan Singh, aged 60 years.

Bhoop Singh S/o Gautam Singh, aged 70 years.

2.ZJNarendra Singh, aged 54 years.

Gautam 28] Sharan Dewa aged 54 years.

29] Shambhoo Singh S/o Dewa Singh, aged 45 years.

Sl.

No.

22 to 29 resident of at village Mudpar, Post Office Tekari.

Tahsil Masturi, District Bilaspur 30] Mangani Singh S/o Mukund Singh, 61 years, resident of at & P.0. Kosa via Gopal Nagar, Tahsil Pamgarh, District Janjgir-Champa

VERSUS

RESPONDNETS 1] Indraman Singh S/o Ganesh Ram, f'

aged 70 years, resident of at & Post Mulmula, Via Gopal Nagar, Tahsil Distriet JanjgirChampa [C.G.] 2] Nirmala Bai Kashyap W/o Ram Gopal, aged 60 years.

&y 3] Sharad Kashyap Ramgopal, aged 36 years,

Sudhir Kashyap Ramgopal, aged 26 years.

.«1/4] Smt.

Sushama Gour Ramgaopal, aged 32 years.

,1.-^] :.,^ 6] Ku.

Rashmi Kashyap Ramgopal, aged 30 years.

L"

Ku.

Archana Kashyap Ramgaopal, aged 28years.

,Z//7] Sl.

No.

to resjdent of Raj Kishore Nagar, near Telephone Exchange, Bilaspur [C.G.j 8] Smt.

Bindiya Bai Kashyap Ganesh Ram, years, resident at Tifra, Bilaspur, Tahsil and District Bilaspur [CG.J 9] Smt. Indra Bai Kashyap W/o Daua Ram, aged 65 years, [Indra Bai Ganesh Ram Kashyap] resident of at & Post Konar Via Gopal Nagar, Tahsil District Janjgir-Champa [C.G.] !ajTjyn -'%."..

r^ iu?^'

T??0 'Vvt33SlO iTy3StirBj Cl-7iita Ram Ram Chandia Sai ^mi, aged 78 years^ ^r ^?- • 11] Laxman S/o Chaitu Bhaina, aged 40 year [Sl. No. 10 and 11 both resident of at and Post Mulmula, Via Gopal Nagar, Tahsil District Janjgir-Champa [C.G.] Sita Bai W/o Lakhan Singh, aged e-''

55 years.

Devendra Kumar Lakhan Singh, aged 32 years.

Dev Kumar Lakhan Singh, aged 30 years.

[Sl. No. 12 to 14, all resident of at Matiya, P.0. Tekari, Tahsil Masturi, District Bilaspur [C.G.] MEMORANDUM OF MISC. CIVIL APPEAL UNDER ORDER 43 RULE 1FK1 READ WITH SECTION 104 OF CIVIL PROCEDURE^ODE, Dissatisfied by the order dated 06.12.2004 of Shrj Banjare 31-d No;jll00y2004 Sneh f--:^i?^y Additional District Judge Janjgir in M.J. Case No;JE10(y2004 Sneh Kumar

!i ^IO-A Smt. Aghan Bai Wd/o Chinta Ram, aged about 55 years, ^1 MO-B Leeladhar S/o Late Chinta Ram, aged about 25 years, ^p"

fwlO-C Pulas S/o Late Chinta Ram, about 17 years, ^IO-D Pintu S/o Late Chinta Ram, '1?

^M1rw~ about 15 years, 10-E Tikadhar S/o Late Chinta Ram, aged s^ o^'

about 10 years, .

', S^.v'

))^"A) iv€-^ 10 F Hema Bai D/o Late Chinta Ram, w/o Laxmi Prasad, aged about 22 years, resident of village Kosamdih, P.S. and Tahsil Masturi, District BUaspur (C.G) Dissatisfied EMORANDUM irKiREAaw dltional District 10-G Ku. Puna D/o Late Chinta Ram, aged_ about_6-v('aTU-

;7 ^•> '>>* h 'Esass Q NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH, BtLASPUR IVIisc. Appeal No.222 of 2005 Sneh Kumar Singh (dead) through Smt. Vijay Laxmi & Ors. -- Appellants

Versus

Indraman Singh & Ors.

-- Respondents For appellants .Smt.Seema Singh, Advocate/ For respondents 1 to 7 and 10Ato 10G : Shri Arun Kumar Bajaj, Advocate on behalfofShri Manoj Paranjpe.

None for respondent No.3 though represented.

HQn^ble^ShrjyustieeGhandra Bhushan Bajpai Order Qn Board 23.12.2016 Learned counsel^or'ttie appeltants submits that she has no instruction on behatfibfffiiS-appeltants.

2.

In view of the submission of learned counsel for the appellants,.

the instant appeal is dismissed for want prosecution.

3.

The appeal is dismissed for want of prosecution. Sd/- (Chandra BhuStian Bajpai) JUDGE Bini aitei",