South Eastern Coalfields Limited Seepat v. Ramo Bai

NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH, BILASPUR MCC No. 212 of 2017

1. South Eastern Coalfields Limited Seepat Through Its Chairman-CumManaging Director, S E C L, Seepat Road, Bilaspur, District Bilaspur, Chhattisgarh

2. The Chief General Manager, S E C L, Raigarh Area, District Raigarh, Chhattisgarh

3. The Deputy Chief Personnel Manager, S E C L Raigarh Area, District Raigarh, Chhattisgarh

4. The Sub Area Manager, Chhal Sub Area, S E C L Raigarh Area, District Raigarh, Chhattisgarh

5. The Officer Incharge (Land Revenue) S E C L, Chhal Sub Area Raigarh, District Raigarh, Chhattisgarh ..................(Respondent No. 1 To 5) ---- Applicants

Versus

1. Ramo Bai W/o Lalan Prasad, Aged About 37 Years D/o Shri Puran Singh, R/o Village Sindhichhap, Post Bajiya, P.S. & Tahsil Dharamjaigarh, District Raigarh, Chhattisgarh ................(Petitioner No.1)

2. Lalan Prasad S/o Shri Girish, Aged About 39 Years R/o Village Sindhichhap, Post Bajiya, P.S. & Tahsil Dharamjaigarh, District Raigarh, Chhattisgarh ...............(Petitioner No.2)

3. The State Of Chhattisgarh, Through The Principal Secretary, General Administration Department, Mahanadi Bhawan, Mantralaya, New Raipur, Chhattisgarh ..............(Respondent No.6)

4. The Collector, Raigarh, District Raigarh, Chhattisgarh ................ (Respondent No.7) ---- Respondents For Applicants :

Shri Vinod Deshmukh, Advocate.

For Respondent No.1 & 2 :

Shri K.K.Pandey, Advocate.

For Respondent No.3 & 4 :

Shri V.B.Singh, Panel Lawyer Hon'ble Shri Justice Sanjay Agrawal Order On Board 17/03/2017 1.

In order to remove the default as pointed out by the Registry, the applicants have submitted a memo of submission along with copy of amended cause-title on

16.03.2017.

2.

On due consideration of the memo of submission, I hereby direct the applicants to substitute this amended cause-title in place of the original cause-title of the application, during the course of the day. 3.

Heard on M.C.C. By way of this application, the applicants are praying for some more time for compliance of the order passed by this Court on 02.12.2016 (Annexure A/1) whereby the applicants have been granted two months' time to consider the claim of the petitioners. The authorities of S.E.C.L. vide letter dated 27.01.2017 (Annexure A/3) have requested for at least 3 months more time, so that compliance could be made, as per the direction passed by this Court on 02.12.2016. More than one and half months time have already elapsed after the issuance of the said letter (Annexure A/3).

4.

Be that as it may, on due consideration of the submissions made in the main application for extension of time for compliance of the order passed by this Court, I hereby allow three months more time from today for doing the needful in the matter.

5.

In view of above, M.C.C. is accordingly disposed of. Sd/- (Sanjay Agrawal) Judge Anjani