Chandram Sahu v. Bhupendra Sahu And Others

IN THE HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR

SECOND APPEAL N0. 13^ OF 2005 1.

CHANpRAM SAHU, SON QF ANTU, AGED ^ ABOUT' YEARS, OCCUPATIONAPPELLANT /6EFENDANTN0.1 AGRICULTURIST AND RESIDENT OF VILLAGE-PAWNI, TAHSIL BILAIGARH, DISTRICT RAIPUR, (CHHATTISGARH).

VE RS U S 1.4 BHUPENDRA SAHU, AGED ABOUT RESPONDENTS YEARS SON OF KEDARNATH;

PLAINTIFFS / '¥'.

C'^W / .my ^2.^ MANMATI SAHU, AGED ABO^T YEARS, WIDOW OF KEDARNATH;

^ 3.^ LUXMI SAHU, AGED ABOUT 61 YEARS, ./ .-..-"

^^ •y/ WIDOW OF KEDARNATH;

4.

YAMINI SAHU, AGED ABOUT 26 YEARS, Q^f DAUGHTER OF KEDARNATH;

5.

GEETA SAHU, AGED ABOUT 25 YEARS, DAUGHTER OF KEDARNATH;

<.6. •& NEELAM SAHU, AGED ABOUT 19 YEARS, DAUGHTER OF KEDARNATH;

.f"

0^7.$ SURENDRANATH, AGED ABOUT YEARS, SON OF KEDARNATH;

THE ABOVE RESPONDENT N0.1 TO ARE OCU-PATION-AGRICULTURISTS AND RESIDENT OF VILLAGE-PAWNI, TAHSIL BILAIGARH, DISTRICT RAIPUR, (CHHATriSGARH).

DEFENDANT N0.2

8. $. MAHARATHI, AGED ABOUT 41 YEARS, y SON OF PHIRTU SAHU;

9-A SMT. BAHARTIN BAI WIDOW OF ^'

BUDHRAM SAHU;

DEFENDANT N0.3 9-B TOKARI, AGED ABOUT 38 YEARS, SON DEFENDANT N0.4

OF BUDHRAM SAHU;

DEFENDANT N0.5 9-C SHYAMA, AGED ABOUT 36 YEARS, SON ^ OF BUDHRAM SAHU;;;^A DEFENDANT N0.6 9-D KANHAIYA, AGED ABOUT 41 YEARS, SON OF BUDHRAM SAHU;

DEFENDANT N0.7 9-E NANKINONI, AGED ABOUT 34 YEARS, -SON OF BUDHRAM SAHU;

THE ABOVE DEFENDANT N0.2 TO 3 ARE LEGAL REPRESENTATIVES OF DEFENDANT N0.3 (BUDHRAM SAHU), SON OFANTU SAHU.

DEFENDANT N0.8 10.a. KRISHNOLAL SON OF CHANDRAM ^ SAHU;

DEFENDANT N0.9 c U.

GANESH SON OF BUDHU SAHU;

^2.T>TUSMIHIN WIDOWOF PILA SAHU;l DEFENDANTN0.10 ••h'

..

• :

THE ABOVE DEFENDANT N0.2 TO 10ARE OCCUPATION-AGRICULTURIST AND RESIDENT QF RESIDENT OF VILLAGEPAWNI,TAHSIL BILAIGARH, DISTRICT RAIPUR, (CHHATTISGARH).

/13,/ STATE OF CHHATTISGARH, THROUGH:

DEFENDANTNO.ll THE COLLECTOR, DISTRICT RAIPUR, (CHHATTISGARH).

SECQND APPEAL UNDER SECTIQN 1QQ_QF THE CIVIL PROCEDURE

t1^ NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH. BILASPUR S.A.No.133of 2005 .

1.

Chandram Sahu -- Appellant

Versus

1.

Bhupendra Sahu And Others •- Respondent ForAppellant:

For Respondent No.13:

None.

'

Shri V. B. Singh, PL.

Single Bench:Hon'ble Shri SanjayAgrawal. J Qrder On Board 06.10.2017 1.

None appears nor any representation is made on behalf of the Appellant even when the case is called in the second round of hearing. 2.

In view of above, this Court is left with no other option but to dismiss the Appeal for want of prosecution.

3.

Accordingly, the instantAppeal is dismissed for want of prosecution. Sd/- (SanjayAgrawal) JUDGE Nikita