Smt. Savita Trivedi v. State Of Chhattisgarh

NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR WPS No. 3310 of 2021 Smt. Savita Trivedi W/o Shri Vijay Trivedi Aged About 35 Years Occupation Teacher Government Higher Secondary School, Tifra, Bilaspur District Bilaspur Chhattisgarh ---- Petitioner

Versus

1.

State Of Chhattisgarh Through Secretary Department Of Urban Administration And Development Mantralaya, Mahanadi Bhawan, Naya Raipur, Police Station Abhanpur, District Raipur Chhattisgarh 2.

Director Urban Administration And Development Block 4 Indravati Bhawan, Atal Nagar, Naya Raipur, District Raipur Chhattisgarh 3.

The Commissioner Municipal Corporation Bilaspur District Bilaspur Chhattisgarh ---- Respondents For Petitioner :

Ms. Deepali Pandey, Advocate For State :

Ms. Akanksha Jain, Dy. G.A.

For Respondent No.3.

:

Mr. H.B. Agrawal, Sr. Advocate along with Mr. Pankaj Agrawal, Advocate Hon'ble Shri Justice P. Sam Koshy Order on Board 06/07/2021 1.

The limited relief sought for by the petitioner in this petition is for an appropriate direction to the respondents for releasing the arrears of pay which the petitioner is entitled for on account of revision of pay granted to the petitioner.

2.

According to counsel for the petitioner, the petitioner was entitled for an amount of Rs. 50,414/- as arrears of pay which till date has not been released. The petitioner has been approaching the authorities in the department, but till date no steps have been taken by the authorities concerned.

3.

Given the said facts and circumstances of the case, this court is of the opinion that ends of justice would meet if the writ petition is disposed of with a direction to the respondents No.2 & 3 to take appropriate decision after due verification of entitlement, so far as arrears of pay that the petitioner is entitled for on account of revision of pay that is taken place, at the earliest, preferably within a period of three months from the date of receipt of copy of this order. 4.

It shall be the responsibility of the petitioner to apprise the respondents No.2 & 3 so far as order passed by this court is concerned. 5.

The writ petition accordingly stands disposed of. Sd/- (P. Sam Koshy) Judge Ved