Smt. Sapna Pandey v. State Of Chhattisgarh
NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR WRIT PETITION (S) NO. 3662 OF 2021 • Smt. Sapna Pandey, W/o Shri Yogesh Pandey, aged about 35 years, Occupation: Teacher, Government Higher Secondary School, Tifra, District Bilaspur (CG) ... Petitioner versus 1.
State of Chhattisgarh, through the Secretary, Department of Urban Administration and Development, Mahanadi Bhawan, Mantralaya, Atal Nagar, Naya P. S. Abhanpur, Raipur, District Raipur (CG) 2.
Director, Urban Administration and Development, Block-4, Indrawati Bhawan, Atal Nagar, Naya Raipur, District Raipur (CG) 3.
The Commissioner, Municipal Corporation, Bilaspur District Bilaspur (CG) ... Respondents For Petitioner :
Ms. Deepali Pandey, Advocate.
For Respondents 1 & 2 :
Mr. Ayaz Naved, Govt. Advocate.
Hon'ble Shri Justice P. Sam Koshy Order on Board /08/2021 1.
The defaults pointed out by the Registry stand ignored as of now. 2.
With the consent of learned Counsels appearing for the respective party, heard the matter finally on admission stage itself. 3.
The limited relief sought for by the Petitioner in the present Writ Petition is for an appropriate direction to Respondents for releasing the arrears of pay which the Petitioner is entitled for on account of revision of pay granted to Petitioner. 4.
According to learned Counsel for Petitioner, the Petitioner was entitled for an amount of Rs.65,376/- as arrears of pay which till date has not been released. Petitioner has been approaching the authorities in the department, but till date no steps have been taken by the authorities concerned. 5.
Given the said facts and circumstances of the case, this Court is of the opinion that ends of justice would meet if the present Writ Petition is disposed of with a direction to Respondents No.2 & 3 to take an appropriate decision so far as arrears of pay that the Petitioner is entitled for on account of revision of pay that is taken place, at the earliest, preferably within a period of three months from the date of receipt of copy of this Order.
6.
It shall be the responsibility of Petitioner to apprise Respondents No.2 & 3 as regards the Order passed by this Court today. 7.
Writ Petition accordingly stands disposed of. Sd/- (P. Sam Koshy) /sharad/ JUDGE