High Court Of ChhattisgarhWPS/3954/2019disposed off

Sanjay Sonwani v. State Of Chhattisgarh

2019-05-17Hon'Ble Shri Justice P. Sam Koshy2 pages

-1NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR WPS No. 3954 of 2019

1. Sanjay Sonwani S/o Bhaiyalal Sonwani Aged About 34 Years R/o Village Tikarkala P.S. Gourela, Tehsil Pendraroad, District- Bilaspur, Chhattisgarh., District : Bilaspur, Chhattisgarh

2. Rajkumar Namdev S/o Late Shri Bhajanlal Namdev Aged About 44 Years R/o Rest House Road Pendraroad, Tehsil Pendraroad, District- Bilaspur, Chhattisgarh., District : Bilaspur, Chhattisgarh

3. Rai Singh Dhurvey S/o Ram Singh Dhurvey Aged About 35 Years R/o Village Matikachar, Tehsil Pendraroad, P.S. Gourela, DistrictBilaspur, Chhattisgarh., District : Bilaspur, Chhattisgarh

4. Harjeet Singh S/o Vishal Singh Aged About 36 Years R/o Village Dumariya, P.S. Gourela, Tehsil Pendraroad, District- Bilaspur, Chhattisgarh., District : Bilaspur, Chhattisgarh ---- Petitioners

Versus

1. State Of Chhattisgarh Through The Secretary Urban Administration And Development Department, Mahanadi Bhawan, Naya Raipur, District- Raipur, Chhattisgarh., District : Raipur, Chhattisgarh

2. The Director Directorate Of Administration And Development Mantralya, Naya Raipur, District- Raipur, Chhattisgarh., District : Raipur, Chhattisgarh

3. Join Director Directorate Of Urban Administration And Development Department, Mahanadi Bhawan, Naya Raipur, District- Raipur, Chhattisgarh., District : Raipur, Chhattisgarh

4. Chief Municipal Officer Nagar Panchayat Gourela District- Bilaspur, Chhattisgarh., District : Bilaspur, Chhattisgarh ---- Respondents For Petitioners :

Mr. Prakash Mishra, Advocate.

For State :

Mr. Saleem Kazi, Dy. A.G.

Hon'ble Shri Justice P. Sam Koshy Order on Board 17/05/2019

1. The counsel for the petitioners submits that, they may be permitted to make a representation to the respondents for ventilating their grievances demanding regularization of service on the ground of having worked with the respondents for a considerable long time.

2. The said prayer is not opposed by the State counsel.

-23. Accordingly, the Writ Petition stands disposed off with liberty to the petitioners for filing a detailed representation ventilating their grievances as regards regularization in service and on such representation being made, the same be decided in accordance with the rules.

4. The Writ Petition accordingly stands disposed off. Sd/- (P. Sam Koshy) Judge Ved