Madina Masjid Committee Dhamtari v. State Of Chhattisgarh

-1NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR Writ Petition (C) No. 1586 of 2020

1. Madina Masjid Committee Dhamtari District Dhamtari Chhattisgarh Through Its President / Sadar, Saiyed Asif Ali, S/o Saiyed Abbas Ali, Aged About 54 Years, R/o Nawagaon Ward, Dhamtari, Police Station Kotwali, Tehsil And District Dhamtari Chhattisgarh.

2. Saiyed Asfaque Ali S/o Late Saiyed Mustaque Ali Aged About 58 Years R/o Aamapara Ward, Dhamtari, Police Station Kotwali, Tehsil And District Dhamtari Chhattisgarh.

---Petitioner(s)

Versus

1. State of Chhattisgarh Through Secretary, Department of Revenue and Disaster Management, Mahanadi Bhawan, Atal Nagar, Mantralaya, Naya Raipur, District Raipur Chhattisgarh.

2. State of Chhattisgarh Through Secretary, Department of Urban Administration And Development, Mahanadi Bhawan, Atal Nagar, Mantralaya, Naya Raipur District Raipur Chhattisgarh.

3. State of Chhattisgarh Through Secretary, Department of Housing and Environment, Mahanadi Bhawan, Atal Nagar, Mantralaya Naya Raipur, District Raipur Chhattisgarh.

4. Commissioner Cum Director Nagar Tatha Gram Nivesh, Indrawati Bhawan, Block No. 4, 3rd Floor, Naya Raipur, District Raipur Chhattisgarh.

5. Nagar Tatha Gram Nivesh Through Its Director, Indrawati Bhawan, Naya Raipur District Raipur Chhattisgarh.

6. Assistant Director Nagar Tatha Gram Nivesh, Dhamtari, District Dhamtari Chhattisgarh.

7. Collector Dhamtari, District Dhamtari Chhattisgarh.

8. Sub Divisional Officer (Revenue) Dhamtari, Tahsil and District Dhamtari Chhattisgarh.

9. Tehsildar Dhamtari, District Dhamtari Chhattisgarh.

10. Municipal Corporation Dhamtari, Through Its Commissioner, District Dhamtari Chhattisgarh.

11. Joint Director Nagar Tatha Gram Nivesh, Indrawati Bhawan, Naya Raipur, District Raipur Chhattisgarh.

---Respondents For Petitioners :

Shri Sarfaraz Khan, Advocate.

For Respondent-State :

Shri Vivek Ranjan Tiwari, Addl. A.G.

For Respondent No.10 :

Shri Sudeep Agrawal, Advocate.

Hon'ble Shri Justice P. Sam Koshy Order on Board 14.08.2020 1.

The present writ petition has been filed by the petitioners for an appropriate decision by the respondents No.2&3 on the representation

-2which the petitioners have made vide Annexure P/3 dated 03.06.2014 and the reminders made thereon to the said representation. The reason for a direction by this court has been sought for by the petitioners is that the respondents are in the process of finalization of a master plan and unless the representation is decided before finalization of the master plan, the interest of the petitioners may get adversely affected. 2.

Learned counsel appearing for the State does not oppose the prayer of the petitioners for an early decision on Annexure P/3 and reminders made thereon.

3.

Accordingly, the respondents No.2&3 are directed to take a decision on the representation Annexure P/3 dated 03.06.2014 and reminders made thereon at the earliest preferably within a period of 90 days from the date of receipt of the copy of this order.

4.

It shall be the responsibility of the petitioners to apprise the respondents No.2&3 so far as the order passed by this court is concerned. 5.

The writ petition stands disposed of.

Sd/- (P. Sam Koshy) Judge inder