← Library
High Court Of ChhattisgarhWPS/3738/2018dismissed

Vishnu Narayan Nath Singh Rathore v. State Of Chhattisgarh

2018-05-17Hon'Ble Shri Justice P. Sam Koshy2 pages

NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR WPS No. 3738 of 2018 Vishnu Narayan Nath Singh Rathore S/o Shri Rangnath Rathore, Aged About 43 Years, Posted And Working As Sub- Engineer ( Tatkalin ) Project Implementation Unit Chhattisgarh Rural Road Development Agency, Korba, Presently Posted In The Office Of The Superintending Engineer, Project Circle No. 01, Chhattisgarh Rural Road Development Agency, Ambikapur, District Surguja Chhattisgarh. ---Petitioner

Versus

1. State Of Chhattisgarh Through The Secretary, Department Of Panchayat And Rural Development Mahanadi, Mantralaya, Naya Raipur, Post Office And Police Station Rakhi, District Raipur Chhattisgarh.

2. Executive Engineer, Rural Development Division, Chhattisgarh Rural Road Development Agency, Raigarh, District Raigarh, Present Correspondence Adress- Office Of The Executive Engineer Cum Member Secretary Project Implementation Unit Chhattisgarh Rural Road Development Agency Raigarh, District Raigarh Chhattisgarh. ---Respondents For petitioner :

Shri Vivek Kumar Agrawal, Advocate.

For State :

Ms.Sunita Jain, Panel Lawyer.

Hon'ble Shri Justice P. Sam Koshy Order on Board 17/05/2018 1.

The challenge in the present Writ Petition is to the order which was passed as early as on 28/03/2017 i.e. more than 14 months ago. 2.

Perusal of record would show that, the petitioner against the said order has not preferred any representation/objection before any of the higher authorities and have now straight away after about 14 months time filed the present Writ Petition.

3.

Thus, this Court is not inclined to entertain the present Writ Petition on the said ground alone.

4.

However, the petitioner would be at liberty to file a representation/objection against the said order before the higher authorities in the department and on such representation being made, the authorities concerned shall consider the same and pass a reasoned order dealing with all the grievances which the petitioner would be raising in his representation/objection.

5.

The Writ Petition accordingly stands disposed off. Sd/- (P. Sam Koshy) Sumit JUDGE