← Library
High Court Of ChhattisgarhWA/185/2021dismissed

The Principal D.P. Vipra College v. Dr. Ramadhar Prasad Pandey

2021-07-12Hon'Ble Shri Justice Manindra Mohan Shrivastava,Hon'Ble Smt. Justice Vimla Singh Kapoor2 pages

NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH, BILASPUR WA No. 185 of 2021 • The Principal D.P. Vipra College Old High Court Road, Bilaspur, Chhattisgarh., District : Bilaspur, Chhattisgarh ---- Appellant

Versus

1. Dr. Ramadhar Prasad Pandey S/o Late Shri Kalika Prasad Pandey Aged About 65 Years Occupation- Assistant Professor (Ex- Incharge Principal), D.P.Vipra College, Old High Court Road, Bilaspur, Chhattisgarh., District : Bilaspur, Chhattisgarh

2. State Of Chhattisgarh Through Secretary, Higher Education Department, Mahanadi Bhawan, Mantralaya, Atal Nagar, DistrictRaipur,chhattisgarh., District : Raipur, Chhattisgarh

3. The Commissioner Higher Education Department, Indrawati Bhawan, Mantralaya, Atal Nagar, District- Raipur, CG. --- Respondents For Appellant/s : Mr. B.P. Sharma, Advocate For Respondent No. 1 : Mr. Rajesh Kesharwani, Advocate For Respondent/State : Mr. Arjit Tiwari, PL D.B.: Hon'ble Shri Justice Manindra Mohan Shrivastava Hon'ble Smt. Justice Vimla Singh Kapoor Order on Board Per Manindra Mohan Shrivastava, J.

12/07/2021 Heard.

Learned counsel for the appellant would argue that when the case was taken up by the learned Single Judge, they did not get an opportunity to argue the matter, though they were represented though a counsel and return was also filed.

The ground on which the writ appeal has been filed is that even though they were represented in the case through a counsel, when the case was called on, they had no opportunity to contest the matter and the order was passed without hearing them.

The grounds which have been taken up in the appeal is that the order has been passed without affording an opportunity of hearing to the writ appellant though it had filed return in the case and that certain documents were also shared by the petitioner during the course of hearing which were also not supplied.

The nature of ground which has been taken in this appeal are such that the appellant should file a review before the learned Single Judge on what has been argued before this Court.

With liberty to file review petition, this Writ appeal is dismissed. Sd/- Sd/- (Manindra Mohan Shrivastava) (Vimla Singh Kapoor) Judge Judge Pawan Prajapati