Hari Charan Ramteke v. State Of Chhattisgarh

NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH, BILASPUR Writ Petition (S) No.456 of 2016

1. Hari Charan Ramteke S/o Late Mahniya, Aged about 61 years, R/o R-5, P-33 Karanti Nagar, Near Jain Mandir Bilaspur, Tahsil-Bilaspur, Police Station-Tarbahar, District Bilaspur (CG)

2. Surendra Ram Teke S/o Late Fagu Ram, Aged about 56 years, R/o Dr.Ambetkar Nagar, Near Satyam Tokise, Bilaspur, Tahsil-Bilaspur, Police Station-Civil Line, Bilaspur, District-Bilaspur (CG)

3. K.R. Druv S/o Late Titra Druv, Aged about 51 years, R/o Jabdapara, Sarkanda, Tahsil-Bilaspur & Police StationSarkanda, District-Bilaspur (CG) ---- Petitioners

Versus

1. State of Chhattisgarh, through Secretary, Panchayat & Gramin Vikas Vibhag, Mahanadi Bhawan, Mantralaya, Capital Complex, Naya Raipur, District Raipur (CG)

2. Director Directorate, Panchayat & Gramin Vikas Vighag, Indrawati Bhawan, Naya Raipur, District Raipur (CG)

3. Chief Executive Officer, Zila Panchayat, Bilaspur, District Bilaspur (CG)

4. Deputy Director, Panchayat Department, Bilaspur, District Bilaspur (CG) ---- Respondents For Petitioners : Mr.A.K.Yadav, Advocate For Respondents No.1, 2 & 4 : Mr.Amit Buxy, P.L. Hon'ble Shri Justice Sanjay K. Agrawal Order on Board 15/12/2021

1. Learned counsel for the petitioners would submit that the petitioners have already made a representation for equal work equal pay on 24.11.2015 (Annexure P-7) before respondents No.1 and 2, which may be directed to be considered and decided expeditiously.

2. Be that as it may, respondent No.1 is directed to consider

and decide the petitioners representation dated 24.11.2015 (Annexure P-7) within three months from the date of receipt of a copy of this order by reasoned and speaking order. It is made clear that this Court has not expressed any opinion on merits of the matter.

3. With the aforesaid observation / direction, the writ petition stands finally disposed off. No order as to cost(s).

Sd/- (Sanjay K.Agrawal) Judge B/-