Smt.Kamini Sharma v. Anand Dubey And Others

JN THE HONfBLE HIGH COU-RT OF ^c CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR fljvj§jon Bench FIRSTH APPEAL N0. -l-^-L-/2005 - DB Dateofpresentation 07-05 APPELLANT , Smt. Kamini Sharma aged about 45 ycars, ofS.D. Sharma, resident ofHouse No.

18/1094, behind of A-l Provision Store, New Shanti Nagar, Raipur, Tah. & Distt. Raipur (C.G.) PLAINTIFF

VERSUS

..^ -^-- RESPONDENTS ^l;

Anand Dubey son of V.P. Dubey Proprietor A.K. Industrief ^'

/ C-47, Industrial Area, Urla, Raipur(C.G.) 2.

V.P. Dubey son of not known, Resident of 13, Jaiashay Marg.

Chaubcy Colony, Raipur (C.G.) 3.

AIok Dubey, Advocate son of V.P. Dubcy, residcnt of 13, Jalashay Marg,Chaubey Colony, Raipur (C.G.) 4.

Dr.{Mr}Anancl Dubey, Vidya Nursing Home, Shankar Nagar, Raipur (C.G.) .ty<^ ^/ \^w / ^ y^/v /-y'

/ ^ / ^ / /.^ / ^7 <?^.^ ^.^ ^'

^.

^ DEFENDANTS ^s^^ FIRST APPEAL UNDRE SECTiON 96 OF CIVIL FROCEDURE CODE.

_i^ riDLC nr .^-^^

NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH. Rll ASPIIR FANo. 157 of 2005 1.

Smt.Kamini Sharma -- Appellant

Versus

1. Anand DubeyAnd Others -- Respondents ForAppellant-None.

?"1^ Mdh'ble Shri Justice Chandra glfuslan Bainai jWder On Board FW;;|J .20^04/2015 1.

As directed vide orde|J»e<:l]1l|62-2015PF is not paid in time. On the other hand, an application^|t|||||||ation of delay in filing of proper RF is filed.

2.

No one is representi%3tl'lBra|aFlant. With this, this Court has no other ^ option but to dismiss the appeal for want of prosecution. 3.

Accordingly, the first appeal is dismissed for want of prosecution. Sd/- C. B. Bajpai Judge Aadil