← Library
High Court Of ChhattisgarhWPS/3125/2013disposed off

Surendra Kumar Jain v. State Of Chhattisgarh And ORS.

2017-07-25Hon'Ble Shri Justice Manindra Mohan Shrivastava2 pages

-1NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH, BILASPUR WPS No. 3125 of 2013 Surendra Kumar Jain S/o Gulab Chand Jain Aged About 55 Years Upper Division Teacher, Posted At Govt. Higher Secondary School Jadutola, R/o Jain Book Stall, Dongargaon, Police Station - Dongargaon, Civil & Revenue District Rajnandgaon District Rajnandgaon C.G.

---- Petitioner

Versus

1. State Of Chhattisgarh Through - The Secretary C.G. Tribal & Scheduled Caste Development Department Mantralaya, Mahanadi Bhawan, New Raipur Distt. Raipur C.G.

2. The Commissioner C.G. Tribal & Scheduled Castes Development Castes Development Department Raipur, District Raipur C.G.

3. The Additional Director C.G. Tribal & Scheduled Castes Development Department, Raipur, District Raipur C.G.

4. The Collector Rajnandgaon Tribal & Scheduled Caste Development Department, District Rajnandgaon C.G.

5. Anil Kumar Pandhare Aged About 54 Years Head Master, Posted At Middle School, Khadgaon, Manpur, District Rajnandgaon C.G.

6. Chandra Shekhar Thakur Aged About 52 Years Lecturer, Posted At Higher Secondary School, Jadutola, Rajnandgaon Distt. Rajnandgaon C.G. ---- Respondents For Petitioner :

Shri Anup Majumdar, Advocate For State :

Shri Satish Gupta, Govt. Advocate S.B. Hon'ble Shri Justice Manindra Mohan Shrivastava Order On Board 25/07/2017 Heard.

1. At the outset, learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the issue of seniority has remained pending with the respondent without any decision. He submits that the records are presently lying in the office of respondent No.2 and the petitioner would be satisfied at this stage if the petition is disposed off with a

-2direction to consider petitioner's claim for seniority.

2. In view of the submission so made, without commenting upon merits of the case, this petition is disposed off with a direction that petitioner's claim for seniority may be considered by the respondents, decision may be taken in three months and if the petitioner is not satisfied, he would be at liberty to revive the petition.

Sd/--- (Manindra Mohan Shrivastava) Judge Praveen