T.R. Kunjam v. State Of Chhattisgarh

NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR WPS No. 3736 of 2018 T.R. Kunjam S/o Late A. G. Shanker Kunjam Aged About 47 Years Posted As Executive Engineer, Public Works Department Bilaspur , R/o E/4, Nutan Colony Sarkanda Bilaspur Chhattisgarh. ---- Petitioner

Versus

1. State Of Chhattisgarh Through Principal Secretary, Public Works Department Mantralaya, Mahanadi Bhawan Naya Raipur, Raipur Chhattisgarh.

2. Engineer-In- Chief, Public Works Department, Office Of The Engineer-In-Chief, Public Works Department Naya Raipur Chhattisgarh.

3. Collector Bilaspur District Bilaspur Chhattisgarh. ----Respondents For Petitioner :

Mr. Yogendra Pandey, Advocate For State :

Mr. Adhiraj Surana, Dy. G.A.

Hon'ble Shri Justice P. Sam Koshy Order on Board 17/05/2018

1. The grievance of the petitioner, in the present writ petition, is the entries that have been made in the ACRs of the petitioner for the year, 2012 onwards up till date.

2. The counsel for the petitioner submits that against all those entries, the petitioner has already preferred a representation before the higher authorities. His further grievance is that the said ACRs were also not communicated to him timely, which was otherwise the requirement of law after the judgment of the Hon'ble Supreme Court in the case of "Devdutt vs. Union of India & others" reported in (2008) 8 SCC 725.

3. Taking into consideration the grievance of the petitioner, as also the fact that the representation, so far as this grievance is pending

consideration before the respondent No.1, this Court is of the opinion that ends of justice would meet if the writ petition is disposed of with a direction to the respondent No.1 to forthwith consider the representation and decide the same as expeditiously as possible and shall objectively consider the grievance of the petitioner taking note of all the contentions that he has raised in the representation.

4. The writ petition accordingly stands disposed off. Sd/- (P. Sam Koshy) Judge Ved