← Library
High Court Of ChhattisgarhWPS/1184/2016disposed off

Ramesh Kumar Dhruw v. State Of Chhattisgarh

2016-04-22Hon'Ble Shri Justice Sanjay K. Agrawal2 pages

NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH, BILASPUR Writ Petition (S) No.1184 of 2016 1.

Ramesh Kumar Dhruw, S/o Shri B.R. Dhruw, aged about 40 Years, Head Master Govt. Primary School Bakla, Block & Tahsil Kasdol, Dist. Baloda Bazar-Bhatapara (Chhattisgarh). 2.

Khelan Ram Sahu, S/o Shri Amruram Sahu, aged about 45 Years, Head Master Govt. Primary School, Block & Tahsil Kasdol, Dist. Baloda Bazar-Bhatapara (Chhattisgarh). 3.

Nand Kumar Sinha S/o Shri Ishwar Lal Sinha, aged about 42 Years, Head Master Govt. Primary School Ghirghol, Block & Tahsil Kasdol, Dist. Baloda Bazar-Bhatapara (Chhattisgarh). 4.

Santosh Tarak, S/o Shri Mannuram Tarak, aged about 41 Years Head Master Govt. Primary School Rangora, Block & Tahsil Kasdol, Dist. Baloda Bazar-Bhatapara (Chhattisgarh). 5.

Bharat Lal Gahre S/o Shri Tejram Gahre, aged about 35 Years Head Master Govt. Primary School Paraguda, Block & Tahsil Kasdol, Dist. Baloda Bazar-Bhatapara (Chhattisgarh). 6.

Ramsai Tandey, S/o Shri Nathuram Tandey, aged about 42 Years, Head Master Govt. Primary School Dadakhar, Block & Tahsil Kasdol, Dist. Baloda Bazar Bhatapara (Chhattisgarh). ---- Petitioners

Versus

1.

State Of Chhattisgarh, through its Secretary, School Education Department, Mahanadi Bhawan, Mantralaya, Naya Raipur, Dist. Raipur (Chhattisgarh).

2.

District Education Officer, Baloda Bazar, District Baloda Bazar Bhatapara (Chhattisgarh).

3.

Director, Directorate Public Instructions, Raipur, District Raipur (Chhattisgarh).

4.

Block Education Officer, Kasdol, Dist. Baloda Bazar-Bhatapara (Chhattisgarh).

---- Respondents For Petitioners : Shri R.S. Patel, Advocate.

For Respondents/State : Shri Dhiraj Wankhede, G.A.

Hon'ble Shri Justice Sanjay K. Agrawal Order On Board

22/04/2016 (1) Heard.

(2) Learned counsel appearing for the State/respondents would submit that the petitioners' representation shall be considered and decided by the competent authority within a period of three months from today.

(3) Prayer appears to be fair and reasonable.

(4) Accordingly, the writ petition is disposed of, in terms of statement made by learned counsel for the State/respondents. Sd/- (Sanjay K. Agrawal) Judge L/-