Mohd. Siddique v. Smt. Asha Nadam

NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH, BILASPUR WPC No. 1432 of 2018

1. Mohd. Siddique S/o Mohd. Gaffar, Aged About 68 Years R/o. Near Main Road Gandhi Putla, Ward No. 34, Juna Bilaspur, Old High Court Road, In front Of Khanduja Hospital, Bilaspur, District Bilaspur Chhattisgarh.

---- Petitioner

Versus

1. Smt. Asha Nadam W/o. Late C.S. Lalit, Aged About 57 Years

2. Sunil Nadam, S/o. Late C.S. Lalit Nadam, Aged About 33 Years Respondents No.1 & 2 are R/o. Near Main Road Gandhi Putla, Ward No. 34, Juna Bilaspur, Old High Court Road, Bilaspur, District Bilaspur Chhattisgarh.

3. Smt. C.G. Ritu, W/o. C.H. Gonal, Aged About 36 Years R/o. 2-2297, Kishanpura, Hanamkunda, Warangal (Telangana), 500 601 ---- Respondent For Petitioner Shri Surfaraj Khan, Advocate Hon'ble Shri Justice Prashant Kumar Mishra Hon'ble Shri Justice Ram Prasanna Sharma Order On Board By Shri Prashant Kumar Mishra J.

18/05/2018

1. Heard.

2. Shri Surfaraj Khan, learned counsel for the petitioner would demonstrate extreme urgency in the matter due to which the petitioner is compelled to prefer the instant writ petition.

3. Under Section 13 of the Chhattisgarh Rent Control Act, 2011 the order under challenge is appealable before the Supreme court. However, the appellant would demonstrate lack of resources for immediately moving the Supreme Court. It is also highlighted that due to ensuing summer vacation, there may be some difficulty in getting the matter listed, therefore, some breathing period may be allowed to the petitioner.

4. Considering the submission, the writ petition is disposed of with observation that for a period of 6 weeks from today, the order of eviction shall remain in abeyance.

5. It is made clear that this order shall not be construed to be an opinion on the merits of the case neither it would be permissible for the petitioner to claim equity on the basis of this interim order.

6. Certified copy today.

Sd/- Sd/- Judge Judge Prashant Kumar Mishra Ram Prasanna Sharma Akhilesh